Fit for Growth

The EU’s 2025 Work Plan: What It Means for Consumer Choice

The European Commission’s 2025 Work Programme, titled “Moving Forward Together: A Bolder, Simpler, Faster Union,” outlines key priorities that will shape policies impacting consumers across the continent. As consumer advocates, we at the Consumer Choice Center (CCC) are closely analyzing these plans to ensure they prioritize innovation, consumer choice, and regulatory simplicity rather than burdening citizens and businesses with excessive red tape.

We’ve categorized the most significant aspects under three pillars: Fit for Growth, Tech Innovation, and Lifestyle Choices.

Red Tape Loss

At the end of last year, we published a report on the Red Tape Loss, detailing how excessive bureaucracy and overregulation in Europe are not only driving up costs for consumers but also stifling innovation, limiting access to new products, and restricting service availability. You can read the full report here.


1. Fit for Growth: A Competitive and Consumer-Friendly Market

The EU recognizes that bureaucracy and overregulation have stifled economic growth and entrepreneurship. The 2025 Work Programme sets out several measures aimed at reducing burdens on businesses and consumers, but will they be enough?

Regulatory Simplification and Investment Boosts

  • The Commission plans to reduce reporting obligations by at least 25% and by 35% for SMEs, aiming to make compliance easier for businesses. A streamlined regulatory environment should, in theory, allow businesses to focus on innovation rather than paperwork.
  • The Industrial Decarbonization Accelerator Act and European Biotech Act aim to cut through bureaucratic delays in biotech and energy-intensive industries. While decarbonization is important, it must be done in a way that does not restrict consumer choice or drive up costs.
  • The Savings and Investment Union aims to boost capital market access for European businesses, which could help lower prices and increase product variety for consumers.

✅ Consumer Win: Less red tape means faster innovation and more choices.
⚠️ Risk: Will the EU truly simplify regulations, or just create different ones?


2. Tech Innovation: A Digital Future That Works for Consumers

The Commission is betting big on AI, quantum computing, and cross-border digital services, but risks remain if regulations become overly restrictive.

Digital Networks and AI Development

  • The Digital Networks Act will promote cross-border network operations, potentially reducing telecom costs for consumers.
  • The Apply AI Strategy and AI Factories Initiative aim to boost Europe’s AI sector, but it remains to be seen whether the upcoming AI regulations will encourage innovation or stifle it with excessive compliance costs.
  • European Business Wallets will simplify business-to-business and consumer transactions, potentially enhancing trust and reducing friction in digital purchases.

✅ Consumer Win: More connectivity and AI-powered services could enhance consumer experiences.
⚠️ Risk: If AI regulations are too restrictive, Europe may lag behind global competitors, limiting tech-driven consumer benefits.


3. Lifestyle Choices: A Balance Between Sustainability and Freedom

The EU is advancing sustainability policies, but consumer freedom must remain protected.

Food Security and Agriculture

  • The Vision for Agriculture and Food aims to ensure stable food prices and supply, but could lead to more intervention in food markets.
  • A proposed EU-wide biotechnology framework could allow for faster approval of new food innovations, benefiting consumers with healthier and more sustainable options.

Energy and Consumer Costs

  • The Clean Industrial Deal focuses on reducing emissions while maintaining competitiveness, but consumers must be protected from rising energy costs.
  • Plans to phase out Russian energy imports entirely could impact energy prices and availability, making affordability a key issue.

✅ Consumer Win: Sustainable food and energy policies can improve long-term affordability.
⚠️ Risk: Overregulation may lead to price increases and reduced choices in food and energy markets.


Conclusion: Will 2025 Be the Year of Consumer Choice?

While the EU’s work plan includes positive steps for economic simplification and technological innovation, the success of these initiatives will depend on how they are implemented.

Consumers benefit most when markets are free, competitive, and innovative—not when excessive regulations limit choices. The CCC will continue to monitor and advocate for policies that empower consumers, reduce bureaucratic burdens, and promote a vibrant, innovation-driven economy.

👉 Want to stay informed on consumer choice in the EU? Follow the Consumer Choice Center for updates and advocacy!

Canadians Demand More Internet Choice—It’s Time for Action

A recent study by Rubicon Strategy has confirmed what many Canadians have been saying for years: the lack of competition in the internet service market is hurting consumers. With a majority of Canadians supporting increased competition and 71% backing the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in allowing all providers to expand, it’s clear that policymakers must act in favor of consumer choice.

The State of Internet Competition in Canada

For far too long, internet services in many parts of Canada have been dominated by a few major players. In Ontario, Rogers and Bell have maintained a duopoly, while in Quebec, Bell and Cogeco hold a similar grip on the market. This lack of competition has led to higher prices, fewer service options, and slower adoption of cutting-edge technology.

Canadians are fed up. The Rubicon Strategy study found that an overwhelming 9 in 10 Canadians believe they should have the right to choose their internet provider. This isn’t just about preference—it’s about fairness, affordability, and access to better services.

More Competition Means Lower Prices

One of the key findings of the research is that a large majority of Canadians believe that increasing competition will lead to lower prices. And they’re absolutely right. When companies are forced to compete, they must offer better deals, improved customer service, and enhanced technology to attract consumers.

But the government’s actions don’t always reflect this economic reality. If policymakers allow protectionist measures that shield major telecom companies from competition, consumers will continue to suffer. Nearly three-quarters of Canadians say they would doubt the government’s commitment to affordability if it restricts internet choice. In an era where affordability is a top concern, maintaining competition should be a no-brainer.

The CRTC’s Role and the Federal Government’s Review

The CRTC originally ruled in favor of allowing all providers to expand their services across Canada, a decision widely praised by consumer advocates. However, the federal government has now ordered a review of this decision, raising concerns that it may cave to pressure from large telecom companies that want to keep competition out.

The research shows that Canadians want the CRTC to stick to its decision: 71% support the CRTC rejecting the government’s order to reconsider and proceeding with its original plan to expand competition. This is a clear call for regulatory independence and consumer-focused policymaking.

An Election Issue in the Making

Politicians should take note: blocking internet service provider expansion is shaping up to be a significant election issue. If the government makes a decision that leads to less competition and fewer choices for Canadians, many voters say they would be less likely to support that party.

This issue isn’t just about internet service—it’s about whether the government truly prioritizes consumers over corporate interests. With the next election on the horizon, leaders who ignore the public’s demand for more choice in internet services may face significant political consequences.

The Consumer Choice Center’s Call to Action

At the Consumer Choice Center, we have long championed competition, innovation, and consumer freedom. The findings of this research reinforce what we have been advocating: Canadian consumers deserve better, and they deserve the right to choose their internet service provider.

We urge the federal government to respect the CRTC’s decision and allow all providers to expand. Instead of protecting outdated monopolies, policymakers must focus on policies that encourage investment, lower prices, and improve service quality for all Canadians.

The message from Canadians is loud and clear: more competition, better prices, and real consumer choice. The government must listen—or risk facing the consequences at the ballot box.

Loading...

The EU and the Costs of Overregulation: A Call for Innovation

Commentators have long praised the European Union (EU) for its robust regulatory framework, which aims to protect consumers, ensure environmental sustainability, and maintain market fairness. However, this commitment to regulation is increasingly proving to be a double-edged sword. While well-intentioned, excessive rules often stifle innovation and impose significant opportunity costs on businesses and consumers, leaving the EU behind more innovation-driven economies like the United States and parts of Asia.

Innovation and Regulation: A Growing Divide  

The EU’s regulatory approach has often hindered progress in space exploration, robotics, artificial intelligence, and agriculture. While U.S. companies like SpaceX have revolutionized space travel with reusable rockets, the EU focuses on policies like tethered bottle caps to reduce plastic waste. Ironically, this directive has increased plastic use and caused billions of euros lost in business adaptation costs, diverting resources from areas like waste management innovation or advanced recycling.  

Similarly, in robotics, American firms like Boston Dynamics are pushing the boundaries of what machines can do, as the EU is stuck focusing on standardization, such as mandating universal USB-C chargers. Although such measures offer consumer convenience, they fail to address more significant technological leaps that could transform industries.  

U.S. companies are preparing to reintroduce supersonic travel in aviation, cutting transatlantic flight times in half. By contrast, EU countries such as France have banned certain short-haul flights to reduce carbon emissions. Although this policy is symbolic, affecting only a tiny fraction of transportation emissions, it highlights European preference for restrictions over advancements.  

The Costs of Bureaucracy  

Overregulation imposes costs that go beyond compliance. For example, adapting bottling lines to meet the EU’s tethered caps directive has cost companies between 2.7 and 8.5 billion euros —resources that could have been used to innovate products or improve environmental practices. Meanwhile, other regions invest heavily in technologies that promise transformative change. SpaceX’s $1.9 billion spent on reusable rockets demonstrates how funds can achieve global impact when directed toward innovation.  

In agriculture, the EU’s ambitious Farm2Fork strategy, which sought to reduce pesticide use and promote organic farming, stalled due to bureaucratic conflict between DG Sante and Agri, the two agencies responsible,  and left farmers at risk of not finding any buyers for their fresh produce and reeling from the shortage of effective fertilizers and livestock feed. The resulting delays and pushback from agricultural communities reflect a broader issue: regulations designed without adequate consideration of practical implementation can do more harm than good.  

A Path Forward  

The EU must shift its regulatory philosophy to prioritize innovation without compromising its goals of sustainability and fairness. Policymakers must focus on creating environments that enable technological breakthroughs, whether through streamlining approval processes, fostering public-private collaborations, or investing in R&D.  

Environmental objectives and technological advancements should not be seen as opposing forces. The EU has an opportunity to champion innovations that address environmental challenges, such as improved recycling technologies or AI-powered efficiency tools, rather than focusing on restrictive measures like product bans.  

Innovate or Lag Behind  

The EU is at a crossroads. While its regulatory frameworks have provided safety and stability, an overemphasis on control leaves Europe isolated in an increasingly competitive global landscape. Other regions are investing in the technologies of tomorrow, from artificial intelligence to advanced robotics. At the same time,  Europe implements policies that stifle progress.  

The solution is not to abandon regulation but to rethink its role. Rules should enable, not hinder, progress. The EU must act decisively to reduce red tape, embrace innovation, and position itself as a global leader in shaping the future. The choice is clear: adapt and thrive or risk falling further behind.  

Red Tape Loss

We published a report on the Red Tape Loss, detailing how excessive bureaucracy and overregulation in Europe are not only driving up costs for consumers but also stifling innovation, limiting access to new products, and restricting service availability. You can read the full report here.

To President-Elect Trump: A Return To Consumer Choice 

Donald Trump has been elected to return to the White House in an overwhelming election against Vice President Kamala Harris. Many factors drove the US electorate toward supporting Trump-Vance, among them concerns about the economy, inflation, and the cost of living in America, as well as illegal immigration and the scope of government in people’s lives. Despite some indicators that Team Trump envisions a more activist federal government, Trump’s voters have resoundingly expressed a preference for less government in their lives. At the Consumer Choice Center, our chief concern has been ensuring that consumers of goods, products, and services have the maximum autonomy to make decisions about their own lives, health, and preferences. 

The freedom to vote with your wallet in everyday life is a core principle of our work and an indicator of how free a society truly is. Over the past four years, the Biden Administration has opened up a multifront war on consumer choice with inquisitions against tech innovation, free speech and privacy online, corporate mergers and acquisitions that lower prices and improve services, and even using federal agencies to discourage choice around responsible alcohol consumption and buying gas-powered cooking implements for home use. 

Over the next four years, President-Elect Donald Trump and JD Vance have an opportunity to get America back on track with a new approach on these issues:

1. Rein in the FTC’s Overreach and Focus on Genuine Consumer Harm

To strengthen consumer freedom and choice, the administration should work to rein in the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and refocus its mission on addressing actual consumer harm. Under Chair Lina Khan, the FTC has aggressively pursued popular, successful companies, not necessarily because of consumer complaints or harm, but rather due to a general suspicion of large market players. This has been a spending boondoggle and dampened public trust in the FTC’s role as a consumer watchdog. Instead of targeting companies solely for their marketplace successes, the FTC should prioritize cases where consumer welfare is demonstrably threatened—like fraud, deceptive practices, or anti-competitive behavior that limits choices. Reorienting the FTC’s efforts back toward genuine consumer protection would ensure its resources are used effectively and that enforcement actions genuinely benefit consumers, rather than punishing companies simply for being innovative and experiencing growth.

2. Protect Digital and Data Privacy Rights

As more commerce and consumer services move online, data privacy becomes essential for consumer freedom and choice. Ensuring consumers can control their personal data and trust online services is key. Legislation or executive action that reinforces data protection while promoting transparency could strengthen consumers’ choices and security.

A reasonable national data privacy law that strengthens user privacy while providing streamlined certainty to firms that offer services to consumers can achieve this. As the Internet becomes more integral to our personal and economic relationships, reasonable measures to protect our information from both bad actors and government overreach should be addressed.
Added to this, the jawboning of various tech services and forced deplatforming and censorship of free speech online throughout the Biden Administration demonstrated the necessity and sanctity of Section 230. We hope the Trump Administration continues to uphold this vital piece of American law, granting online publishers and platforms the flexibility they need to offer consumers great services and products online.

3. Unleash Broadband Connectivity by Expanding LEO Satellite Networks

President-Elect Trump has a prime opportunity to bridge the digital divide by enabling more Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites to expand broadband access nationwide. The Biden administration poured nearly $65 billion into broadband initiatives as part of its Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, intending to connect millions of Americans to high-speed internet. However, many rural and underserved areas remain disconnected, bogged down by a regulatory approach that has struggled to deliver promised connectivity. By reducing bureaucratic hurdles and allowing more LEO satellites to launch, the Trump administration could rapidly expand high-speed internet access to hard-to-reach communities. LEO satellites, unlike traditional broadband infrastructure, offer near-global coverage without costly ground installations, making them ideal for remote and rural areas. With streamlined approval processes and incentives for satellite providers, Trump could fast-track a new era of connectivity—one that sidesteps the red tape that has stalled progress and finally connects Americans wherever they live.

4. Encourage Free Trade Agreements with Liberal Democratic Allies 

An important step to enhancing consumer freedom in the 21st century is to foster free trade agreements among American allies among liberal democracies. Tariffs and the shadow of trade war has been a staple of the Trump campaign since he first entered politics in 2016. President Biden even went so far as to borrow tariff policy from Donald Trump as a means to shore up American domestic business interests. The problem remains, what is best for consumers on tight budgets who prioritize affordability? 

By creating a robust trade network with countries committed to fair practices and liberal democratic norms, the U.S. can not only provide consumers with more diverse, affordable options but also curb the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the global economy. The CCP has repeatedly acted as a bad-faith player in international commerce—using subsidies, intellectual property theft, and market manipulations that undermine free-market principles. Rather than responding with blunt protectionism, which often limits consumer choices and drives up costs, the U.S. can lead a coalition of like-minded nations that champion open markets, transparency, and fair competition. Such a united front could better compete with CCP-backed entities and preserve a fairer, freer global marketplace for consumers worldwide. In practice, that means being committed to free trade with allies and thinking bigger about fairness in trade.

5. A Light Touch Approach to Crypto and 21st Century DeFi Tools 

President-Elect Trump has a unique opportunity to unleash the potential of cryptocurrency and strengthen financial freedom for Americans by adopting an innovation-friendly approach. 2024 was the first election in history where both Republican and Democrat campaigns made an appeal to consumers in the crypto market. This is monumental progress toward consumer financial freedom. Trump and Vance could promote a clear, light-touch regulatory framework, giving consumers and entrepreneurs confidence in their investments without stifling growth. Worthwhile legislation to ban the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency, reform the Bank Secrecy Act, promote a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and provide a regulatory path for stablecoins to boost the American dollar would be key to this success.

Reducing barriers for crypto exchanges and clarifying tax rules would also make it easier for Americans to access and invest in digital assets. President Trump could also encourage decentralized finance (DeFi) tools (especially considering he’s the head of one), empowering individuals to manage finances outside traditional banks and credit card companies. Finally, by working with international allies on shared standards, Donald Trump could ensure the U.S. remains a leader in this global industry—especially crucial as China tightens control over its own digital currency. With this approach, Trump could position the U.S. as a hub for crypto innovation, reaping economic benefits while safeguarding consumer choice and financial freedom. Republicans in Congress will need to be rapidly educated on the mechanics of cryptocurrency and decentralized finance tools, lest enemies of this sector such as Senator Elizabeth Warren, set the tone in Washington on this issue. 

6. More Transparency In Healthcare Will Go A Long Way For Consumers

The incoming Trump administration has an opportunity to drastically improve the healthcare space in a way that will greatly benefit consumers and patients. One easy first step would be to require that health insurance firms increase transparency and publicly release meaningful data on which services require pre-authorization, how often pre-authorization requests are denied, how often coverage is denied, and other crucial metrics to help consumers make more educated decisions when entering into insurance plans. 

Additionally, while President-Elect Donald Trump has previously endorsed an “America First” mentality, it is our hope that this does not negatively bleed into healthcare policy. He’s previously championed the “Most Favored Nation” rule, which allows foreign governments to decide the value of certain medicines. In reality, this price-setting mechanism would cause disruptions to patient access to certain medications while disincentivizing important medical innovation. A better path forward will be to allow meaningful competition amongst manufacturers while maintaining strong intellectual property protections that safeguard and promote more research and development.

7. End the World Health Organization’s Meddling in US Policymaking

President-Elect Donald Trump and JD Vance need to act quickly to diminish the influence of the World Health Organization (WHO) in U.S. policymaking on consumer products. One of the most pressing live issues where the WHO’s presence can be felt is the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) study of the health impacts of adult alcohol consumption, which is designed to rework the US Dietary Guidelines and discourage any and all safe consumption of alcohol products. Consumer choice matters, and the WHO’s research has been shown to be tainted by activist bias and published in disregard of the most reputable scientific research on the health impacts of responsible enjoyment of alcohol. The same goes for the international campaign against nicotine products that are reducing the harm of smoking combustible tobacco in the US, UK and Canada. The FDA has stonewalled the growth of smokeless nicotine products, despite evidence from within the EU that shows the enormous public health potential of offering smokers an alternative. Donald Trump and JD Vance can get this balancing act right and get the federal government on the side of harm reduction and sound science by increasing skepticism within federal agencies of the World Health Organization.

Some Innovate, Others Regulate

In the fast-paced world of technological advancement, innovation is often hailed as the key to progress. Yet, while some regions focus on pushing boundaries, others seem to prioritize regulation. The result? Companies in these areas end up spending more time adapting to rules than creating groundbreaking products that improve consumers’ lives.

en_USEN

Follow us

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

OTTAWA

718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5

© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER

Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org