fbpx

Author: Tarmizi Anuwar

Introducing a licensing system for selected shops selling vapes will make it difficult for consumers to access safer products

KUALA LUMPUR, 18th March 2024 – As the Malaysian government contemplates the implementation of a licensing system for selected shops selling vaping products, the Consumer Choice Center (CCC) voices concern over the potential consequences on consumer access to safer vaping alternatives. With a mission to promote consumer choice and empower individuals, CCC emphasizes the importance of preserving access to diverse and high-quality vaping products for informed consumer decision-making.

The proposed licensing system, while aiming to address concerns surrounding vaping, may inadvertently hinder access to safer vaping options for consumers. CCC underscores the necessity of balanced regulation that prioritizes both public health objectives and consumer choice. By restricting the availability of licensed vape shops, consumers may face limited options, potentially resorting to less regulated or unsafe alternatives.

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar stated, “Introducing a licensing system for selected vape shops could inadvertently push consumers towards unregulated channels, undermining public health objectives. We advocate for policies that empower consumers with access to a variety of safer vaping products while ensuring appropriate regulatory oversight.”

“Accessibility to access alternative products is very important to help consumers quit smoking. The selective store licensing system only makes it difficult for consumers to access safer products and tends to return to smoking and the black market.”

The Consumer Choice Center stresses the importance of transparency and consumer involvement in the formulation of regulatory measures concerning vaping products. As such, CCC emphasizes the necessity for the Ministry of Health to publicly disclose the regulatory details of any proposed vape regulations.

“This transparency would enable consumers to provide feedback and express their concerns regarding the potential impact on accessibility and product diversity. By soliciting input from the individuals directly affected by these regulations, policymakers can ensure that any proposed measures align with consumer preferences and prioritize public health objectives effectively,” he said.

Commenting further on the proposed regulation of vape, the Tarmizi underscores the importance of embracing technological neutrality. By recognizing the diverse array of nicotine delivery products available on the market, including open, closed, or disposable vapes, heated tobacco, and oral nicotine, policymakers can foster an environment that promotes consumer choice and encourages innovation.


“Technological neutrality guarantees freedom of choice by not forcing consumers or companies to use any particular technology. The use of specific technologies will discriminate against other technologies to the point of increasing operating costs and the price of final goods. Furthermore, it makes it difficult for consumers to access and buy vapes or alternative products that are less harmful and cheaper” he concluded.

Cut plastic waste with tax incentives for private R&D, says NGO

A consumer group has suggested tax incentives for companies and consumers as part of efforts to reduce plastic waste, especially those targeted at research and development (R&D) in the private sector.

Tarmizi Anuwar, the Malaysian representative of the Washington-based Consumer Choice Centre, said that emphasis on private sector R&D could lead to the production of cheaper sustainable alternatives.

“Incentives do not necessarily mean grants. If a company or the private sector invests in R&D, the government should give tax exemptions or at least reduce taxes for them,” he told FMT.

Tarmizi said these measures should be complemented by reduced trade barriers for the import of alternatives as well as reduced bureaucracy, streamlining patent processes for sustainable products.

Read the full text here

Don’t segregate migrant workers, says activist

Banning migrant workers from living in housing estates will create divisions in society and a sense of “us versus them”, according to a consumer advocate.

Tarmizi Anuwar, the Malaysian representative of Washington-based Consumer Choice Centre, said a ban announced last week by the Negeri Sembilan state government was against the principle of inclusivity and may result in social tensions.

Banning migrant workers from living in housing estates will create divisions in society and a sense of “us versus them”, according to a consumer advocate.

Tarmizi Anuwar, the Malaysian representative of Washington-based Consumer Choice Centre, said a ban announced last week by the Negeri Sembilan state government was against the principle of inclusivity and may result in social tensions.

Arul said the state government will encourage the construction or conversion of buildings for dormitories, after complaints of migrant workers in housing areas causing disturbances and creating cleanliness problems.

Read the full text here

Biarkan Grab terus menjadi Grab

Perubahan kepada struktur harga tambang asas Grab Malaysia daripada RM5 kepada RM4 baru-baru ini mencetuskan rasa tidak puas hati dalam kalangan kira-kira 300 pemandu Grab yang diwakili Persatuan Penghantar P-Hailing Malaysia, khususnya di Lembah Klang.

Penstrukturan semula itu melibatkan pengurangan tambang asas pemandu sambil meningkatkan insentif untuk penghantaran pada waktu puncak, pengambilan jauh dan masa tambahan bagi penghantaran barangan kutipan (pick-up).

Penstrukturan itu mencetuskan bantahan yang ketara dengan pemandu menggesa kerajaan untuk campur tangan.

Senario itu mempunyai persamaan yang ketara dengan protes yang dimulakan oleh pemandu teksi pada 2016 dan 2018 apabila mereka mendesak kerajaan mengharamkan Grab.

Ketika itu pembantah menganggap kemudahan Grab sebagai pesaing langsung kepada perkhidmatan teksi tradisional.

Walaupun keadaan yang membawa kepada kontroversi Grab kali ini agak berbeza, ada satu persamaan di antara mereka iaitu gesaan agar kerajaan terlibat membentuk dasar yang memberi kesan kepada sektor swasta.

Artikel ini tidak berhasrat untuk menolak rungutan penghantar atau rakan pemandu, apatah lagi mempertahankan Grab, tetapi ingin menekankan kepentingan mempertahankan pilihan pengguna.

Ia menggesa kerajaan agar berhati-hati terhadap desakan tergesa-gesa atau bersifat populis yang berpotensi membebankan pengguna dengan kesan campur tangan dasar untuk menetapkan kadar lantai.

Read the full text here

Banning foreign workers from residential areas will cause isolation and prevent social cohesion

KUALA LUMPUR, 31st January 2024 – The Consumer Choice Center expresses its deep concern regarding the recent policy implemented by the Negeri Sembilan State Government, which restricts foreign workers from residing in residential may inadvertently lead to isolation and hinder social cohesion within communities, which goes against the principles of inclusivity and diversity that make our societies vibrant and dynamic.

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar stated, “Banning foreign workers from residential areas may lead to isolation and hinder social cohesion within communities. Diversity is a key component of vibrant and thriving societies, contributing to a rich tapestry of cultures, perspectives, and experiences. Exclusionary policies can create divisions, fostering a sense of “us versus them” that may result in social tensions.”

Furthermore, this policy could result in increased expenditures for migrant workers, as living in commercial zones tends to be more expensive. This financial burden may disproportionately affect the well-being of foreign workers and their ability to contribute positively to the local economy.

“The restriction of foreign workers to commercial zones may increase their living expenses, creating an additional financial strain that could negatively impact their overall quality of life.”

Additionally, such policies may have economic repercussions especially to the local businesses. Migrant workers contribute to local economies through their consumption patterns. Restricting their access to residential areas may limit their participation in local businesses, affecting the economic dynamics of the area. 

“Restricting foreign workers from residential areas not only jeopardizes social cohesion but also poses significant economic risks. Migrant workers play a vital role in local economies, contributing through their consumption patterns. By limiting their access to communities, we risk hindering their participation in local businesses, thereby impacting the economic dynamics of the area. Embracing diversity and inclusivity not only fosters social harmony but also bolsters economic prosperity for all.”

Instead of outright bans, the focus should be on promoting diverse housing options, taking inspiration from successful models such as those implemented in Singapore. By encouraging mixed-use developments, we can create vibrant neighborhoods that accommodate the needs of both residents and foreign workers.

“Emulating successful housing models like Singapore’s, which promote inclusivity and diversity, can lead to the development of vibrant communities where everyone has a place to call home.” he concluded.

JS-SEZ tingkat akses, pilihan pasaran pengguna

Pusat Pilihan Pengguna (CCC) percaya perjanjian mewujudkan Zon Ekonomi Khas Johor-Singapura (JS-SEZ) dapat menyumbang kepada persekitaran yang lebih baik untuk pengguna di Malaysia dan Singapura, terutama dari segi akses kepada pasaran dan pilihan pengguna.

Wakil CCC Malaysia, Tarmizi Anuwar berkata, memorandum persefahaman (MoU) JS-SEZ mampu menarik lebih banyak pelaburan asing, meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi dan menggalakkan perdagangan antarabangsa antara Malaysia serta Singapura.

“Lazimnya, zon ekonomi khas memberi tumpuan kepada aktiviti berorientasikan eksport yang mana perniagaan  mengeluarkan barangan dan perkhidmatan untuk pasaran antarabangsa antara Malaysia dan Singapura.

“Secara tidak langsung, ini memudahkan pengaliran barangan dan perkhidmatan antara kedua-dua negara. Apabila usahawan mengakses lebih banyak peluang ini kemudian mampu menyediakan pengguna dengan pelbagai pilihan yang lebih luas,” katanya dalam kenyataan.

Berhubung inisiatif menggunakan kod QR di pusat pemeriksaan darat, beliau berpendapat, penghapusan keperluan pasport memudahkan perjalanan pengguna dan menggalakkan pelancongan antara negara. 

Read the full text here

Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone will increase market access and choice for consumers

KUALA LUMPUR, 11th January 2024 – The Consumer Choice Center believes that the agreement to establish the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone will contribute to creating a better environment for consumers in both Malaysia and Singapore, especially in terms of access to the markets and consumer choices. 

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar stated, “The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Malaysia and Singapore to establish the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) is able to attract more foreign investment, increase economic development and promote international trade between Malaysia and Singapore.”

“Typically, special economic zones will focus on export-oriented activities where businesses will produce goods and services for the international market between Malaysia and Singapore. Indirectly, this will facilitate the flow of goods and services between the two countries. As entrepreneurs access more opportunities, this then provides consumers with a wider variety of options.”

One of the proposals that will be implemented is to introduce passport-free travel by using a QR code at land checkpoints. Commenting on this, Tarmizi opined, “Eliminating the need for a passport makes travel easier for consumers and encourages tourism between countries. Movement and tourism will contribute significantly to the local economy such as spending on accommodation, meals, transport and various goods and services.”

“In addition, the QR code release system on both sides will facilitate the travel process and be very beneficial for business professionals involved in cross-border activities. The QR code system promotes smoother and faster entry, facilitates business operations and fosters international trade and cooperation.

The implementation of a passport-free QR code clearance system between Malaysia and Singapore also has the potential to catalyze significant growth in the technology and innovation sectors.

“This policy will also greatly benefit entrepreneurs and startups in the technology sector with easier access to markets and resources in both countries. This can lead to the growth of cross-border startup hubs and innovation and create a more interconnected and sustainable startup ecosystem. In addition, companies and research institutions can share progress more easily, fostering an environment where technological innovations can be adopted and used quickly,” he concluded. 

Generasi penamat: Jalan ke hadapan

Baru-baru ini Codeblue melaporkan bahawa kerajaan telah membuat keputusan untuk mengeluarkan klausa generasi penamat daripada Rang Undang-undang (RUU) Kawalan Produk Merokok untuk Kesihatan Awam 2023 kerana ia tidak berpelembagaan, atau dianggap bertentangan dengan prinsip kesamarataan dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan. 

Generasi penamat merujuk kepada peruntukan larangan dalam RUU ke atas mereka yang lahir selepas 2007 daripada membeli dan menggunakan produk tembakau serta vape.

Sehingga kini belum ada sebarang kenyataan rasmi daripada Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia (KKM), namun kenyataan bekas menteri, Khairy Jamaluddin, terhadap kewujudan dua menteri dan “the gaffer” sebagai penghalang kepada RUU itu menguatkan lagi kesahihan laporan tersebut.

Keputusan tersebut sudah tentu bukan tindakan yang mudah. Kerajaan berisiko mendapat imej politik yang negatif tetapi itulah perkara yang tepat dan mesti dilakukan.

Menurut Peguam Negara Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh cadangan larangan berasaskan umur tersebut dianggap sebagai tidak berpelembagaan kerana bertentangan dengan jaminan kesaksamaan dalam Perkara 8 Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Dalam erti kata lain, sepatutnya setiap orang adalah sama rata bawah undang-undang dan berhak mendapat perlindungan yang sama. Undang-undang mesti adil untuk semua generasi dan setiap kumpulan masyarakat. 

Undang-undang tidak boleh memberikan kelebihan hanya kepada satu generasi dan mengetepikian generasi yang lain.

Semasa RUU itu pertama kali diperkenalkan pada 2022, perbincangan mengenai hak asasi atau hak kesamarataan tidak diberikan perhatian secara terperinci, atau ruang untuk membahaskan secara terbuka dan selamat tidak ada.

Apabila terdapat ahli parlimen, pakar perubatan, ahli ekonomi atau mana-mana pihak cuba menyuarakan pandangan atau mewacanakan dasar ini tersebut secara kritis, mereka dilabel dengan pelbagai gelaran yang negatif.

Bahkan terdapat ahli parlimen yang tidak berani untuk membincangkan isu berkenaan secara terbuka kerana risau mereka akan dilabel dan dimalukan di media sosial atau khayalak ramai.

Dengan mudah – dan sering kali – golongan yang menyokong generasi penamat menggunakan hujah tiada kebebasan mutlak dan mengatakan ia memudaratkan masyarakat dan alam sekitar tanpa mengambil kira hak pengguna untuk membuat pilihan.

Selain tidak berperlembangan, RUU berkenaan juga dikhuatiri tidak boleh dikuatkuasakan dengan efektif.

Presiden Persatuan Kedai Kopi Petaling Jaya Keu Kok Meng dalam perbincangan meja bulat anjuran Pusat Pilihan Pengguna mengatakan di kedai kopi, dia tidak nampak penguat kuasa datang untuk melarang orang merokok dan walaupun ada undang-undang mengenainya.

Saiz perdagangan tembakau haram Malaysia yang tertinggi di dunia juga menjadi kerisauan sama ada dasar berkenaan boleh dilaksanakan atau tidak. 

Pada Mei 2023, rokok yang diniagakan secara haram merupakan 55.3 peratus daripada pasaran domestik.

Semasa Covid-19, sekitar Mac 2020 Afrika Selatan mengenakan larangan ke atas penjualan produk tembakau selama lima bulan walaupun terdapat kelaziman perdagangan haram dalam pasaran tembakau. 

Kesan daripada itu dalam tinjauan bertajuk Market impact of the COVID-19 national cigarette sales ban in South Africa menunjukkan 93 peratus daripada perokok masih berjaya membeli rokok. 

Purata harga rokok pula melonjak sebanyak 250 peratus berbanding sebelumnya kerana peningkatan dalam pembelian melalui pasaran gelap.

Kurangkan jumlah perokok

Meskipun keputusan berani kerajaan menarik semula generasi penamat wajar diiktiraf, sehingga kini masih belum ada undang-undang yang mengawal selia vape secara sah dan jelas. 

Terutamanya bagi memastikan keselamatan pengguna dan mengelakkan salah faham atau mitos mengenai produk pengurangan kemudaratan berkenaan.

Kerajaan perlu segera memperkenalkan undang-undang pintar untuk mengawal selia vape bagi memastikan keselamatan pengguna dapat terjamin dan kanak-kanak bawah umur dilindungi. 

Ketiadaan undang-undang seumpama itu mendedahkan pengguna kepada risiko produk yang tidak memenuhi peraturan kesihatan di pasaran.

Ketiadaannya juga menyebabkan orang ramai tidak mendapat maklumat tepat mengenai vape yang 95 peratus lebih selamat berbanding rokok dan mampu menjadi alternatif terpenting untuk mengurangkan perokok secara berkesan di Malaysia.

Public Health England menganggarkan vape adalah 95 peratus kurang berbahaya kepada kesihatan pengguna berbanding rokok biasa. 

Salah satu kajian penyelidikan terkini daripada Institut Psikiatri, Psikologi & Neurosains (IoPPN) di King’s College London, pengambilan vape boleh membawa pengurangan ketara dalam pendedahan kepada toksin yang menggalakkan kanser, penyakit paru-paru dan penyakit kardiovaskular.

Ini adalah masa terbaik untuk kerajaan menamatkan mitos mengenai vape dan mengiktiraf pengurangan bahaya tembakau sebagai strategi utama untuk mengurangkan perokok di Malaysia.

Originally published here

Consumer groups celebrate Malaysia follows in the footsteps of New Zealand scraps generational ban

KUALA LUMPUR, 24th November 2023 – The Consumer Choice Center (CCC) has applauded the recent cabinet decision by the Malaysian government to overturn the planned generational endgame. This important step, as mentioned by the Attorney General that it is against the principle of equality of law in the Federal Constitution, is seen as a victory for choice and intelligent policymaking.

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar hailed the decision as a step towards recognising the importance of individual freedom and the potential negative consequences of a generational ban on smoking. Tarmizi stated, “We commend the government’s commitment to choice and sensible policy. Banning an entire generation from accessing legal products is not only paternalistic but can lead to unintended consequences such as illicit trade and exposing consumers to unregulated product risks.”

This decision is in line with recent developments in New Zealand, where plans for a generation ban are also to be abandoned by the new government. Tarmizi commented, “The global trend is shifting towards recognizing that individuals should have the autonomy to make choices for themselves. Malaysia should uphold this decision and continue to consistently move towards policies that empower consumers rather than restrict them.”

In addition, Tarmizi emphasized that the government needs to immediately regulate vaping to ensure the safety of consumers and avoid misunderstandings or myths about this harm reduction product.

“The government needs to immediately introduce smart laws to regulate vaping to ensure the safety of users can be guaranteed and minors protected. The absence of this law exposes consumers to the risk of products that do not meet health regulations on the market.”

“This absence also causes the public to not get accurate information about vaping which is 95 percent safer than cigarettes and able to be the most important alternative to effectively reduce smokers in Malaysia.”

Previously, Malaysia often referred to New Zealand as an example country to implement the generational endgame, but today New Zealand itself has decided to scrap the law. Hence, the Consumer Choice Center encourages the Malaysian government to consider evidence-based and consumer-centric policies that respect individual freedoms and evidence.

Government to remove the Generational Endgame coincides with the principles of the federal constitution

KUALA LUMPUR, 7th November 2023 – The Consumer Choice Center (CCC) is supporting the government’s action to remove the generational endgame from the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Bill 2023 because it is against the principle of equality before the law. 

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar said: “The government’s decision to remove the generational endgame provisions needs to be supported because this coincides with the spirit of the Federal Constitution.” 

“The CCC strongly disagreed with the proposed ban because it violated the fundamental rights of Malaysians that everyone is equal under the law and entitled to equal protection under the law as stated in Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. The law must be fair for all generations and every group of society. The law cannot give only one advantage to one generation and deprive it from another.”

However, Tarmizi emphasized that the government needs to immediately regulate vaping to ensure the safety of consumers and avoid misunderstandings or myths about this harm reduction product.

“The government needs to immediately introduce smart laws to regulate vaping to ensure the safety of users can be guaranteed and minors protected. The absence of this law exposes consumers to the risk of products that do not meet health regulations on the market.”

“This absence also causes the public to not get accurate information about vaping which is 95 percent safer than cigarettes and able to be the most important alternative to effectively reduce smokers in Malaysia.”

Public Health England estimates that vaping is 95 percent less harmful to the user’s health than regular cigarettes. 

One of the latest research studies from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London vaping can lead to a significant reduction in exposure to toxins that promote cancer, lung disease and cardiovascular disease.

“This is the best time for the government to end the myth about vaping and recognize tobacco harm reduction as the main strategy to reduce smokers in Malaysia,” he concluded.

Scroll to top
en_USEN