Author: Tarmizi Anuwar

Thailand’s Nicotine Vape Ban Harms Consumers and Public Health

BANGKOK, TH – Last week, the Thai House of Representatives approved a report proposing three potential approaches to regulating vaping and heated tobacco devices, reinforcing the existing ban, regulating HTPs while maintaining a vape ban, or legalizing both under stern regulations. 

However, defying harm reduction efforts, lawmakers dismissed legalization, citing dubious concerns about health concerns, youth access and enforcement challenges. This effort is not just misguided, but an assault on consumer choice and effective harm reduction.

Shrey Madaan and Tarmizi Anuwar, regional representatives of the global consumer advocacy group Consumer Choice Center, criticized Thailand’s denialism that will continue to harm adult consumers.

Prohibition doesn’t eliminate demand—it fuels black markets. This is evident in countries that have imposed vaping bans, only to see illegal trade flourish,said Shrey Madaan, India Policy Associate

Bhutan’s tobacco ban, once praised as a model for public health, collapsed under the weight of rampant smuggling, forcing the government to reverse course. When governments outlaw safer alternatives while leaving combustible cigarettes on the shelves, they create a perfect storm for organized crime and lost tax revenue,” added Madaan.

The claim that banning vapes and heated tobacco products is essential to protect youth is flawed. Flavored vape products are 2.3 times more effective at helping adult smokers switch from cigarettes. The real health crisis isn’t an alternative nicotine product but continued dominance of the traditional tobacco market. 

Thai policymakers are turning blind eye to concrete scientific evidence that establishes vaping and heated tobacco products are significantly safer alternatives to smoking. Public Health England’s finding has suggested that vaping is about 95% less harmful than traditional cigarettes.

Nations like the UK and Sweden have embraced harm reduction, leading to sharp decline in smoking rates and smoking related deaths. Sweden, which permits use of nicotine pouches, snus and vapes has observed a 55% decline in smoking in a decade and has cancer rates 41% lower than Europe’s average. Japan has also observed a drop in cigarette consumption following the introduction of heat-not-burn devices.

The best solution is not an outright ban but a more holistic approach through education and awareness,” said Tarmizi Anuwar, Malaysia Country Associate

“An effective approach should focus on consumer education and parental responsibility rather than merely enforcing bans that may ultimately encourage the black market. Awareness campaigns based on facts, rather than fear-based tactics, should be promoted to educate young people about making better choices and the consequences of irresponsible nicotine use. Additionally, parents play a crucial role in monitoring and guiding their children in making informed decisions. Effective regulations must balance consumer freedom with regulatory mechanisms that do not infringe on individuals’ rights to choose,” concluded Anuwar.

Thailand remains a hotspot for cigarette tourism, with smoking rates exceeding 19%, much higher than the global average. Rather than embracing proven harm reduction tools, lawmakers are doubling down on prohibition. Previous attempts at modernizing the law have unfortunately fallen short.

The Consumer Choice Center believes there’s a dire need to focus on smart regulation and consumer awareness. If Thailand truly desires to curb smoking-related deaths, it should follow the science, not outdated fears.


The CCC represents consumers in over 100 countries across the globe. We closely monitor regulatory trends in state and national capitals, as well as other hotspots of regulation, and inform and activate consumers to fight for #ConsumerChoice.

Learn more at consumerchoicecenter.org.

Exempt Small Online Businesses from E-Invoicing Requirement

The Consumer Choice Center (CCC), a global consumer advocacy group, today called on the Government to review and amend the current e-invoicing framework, urging authorities to exempt small online businesses earning RM150,000 or less annually. 

Under the present policy, small physical businesses with similar revenue thresholds are exempted, while online businesses are still required to comply with e-invoicing obligations.

The association expressed concern that the unequal treatment of small businesses based solely on their sales channel—physical or online—places unnecessary burdens on micro and small online entrepreneurs. This disparity may also result in higher costs being passed down to consumers, affecting product pricing and limiting variety in the market.

Tarmizi Anuwar, Malaysia Country Associate at the CCC said “As a consumer association, we are deeply concerned that the current e-invoicing policy unfairly penalises small online sellers, many of whom are everyday Malaysians trying to earn an honest living. It is not reasonable that small physical shops are exempt, yet online businesses operating at the same scale are forced to bear additional compliance costs and administrative burdens. Such an imbalance not only discourages digital entrepreneurship but may also reduce healthy market competition, ultimately impacting consumer choice and pricing.”

Many online businesses already use e-wallets, online banking, and digital payment platforms that automatically generate transaction records. These existing financial systems provide transparency and traceability, making additional e-invoicing requirements redundant and unnecessarily bureaucratic. Instead of imposing rigid compliance measures, policymakers should recognize that digital payment adoption itself enhances financial accountability without burdening small entrepreneurs.

“We strongly urge the Government to level the playing field by extending the same exemption to small online businesses. Supporting the growth of small businesses, regardless of whether they operate online or offline, ensures that consumers benefit from a broader range of affordable products and services, while encouraging the development of a fair and inclusive digital economy in Malaysia.”

CCC reiterated its commitment to safeguarding the interests of consumers and small businesses and welcomes engagement with relevant stakeholders to review policies that affect the broader marketplace.

Public Administration Efficiency Commitment Bill to Boost Competitiveness and Transparency

KUALA LUMPUR, 5th March 2025—The Consumer Choice Center (CCC) supports the Public Administration Efficiency Commitment Bill 2025, which seeks to enhance government efficiency, cut bureaucracy, and improve transparency. These reforms are key to strengthening governance, boosting economic growth, and improving Malaysia’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) ranking. By reducing red tape and improving service delivery, the Bill can enhance Malaysia’s competitiveness in attracting investment and fostering a dynamic business environment.

Tarmizi Anuwar, Malaysia Country Associate at the Consumer Choice Center, stated:

“The tabling of the Public Administration Efficiency Commitment Bill is a positive move towards improving government efficiency and reducing regulatory burdens. This initiative aligns with global best practices in governance and public service delivery. By addressing excessive bureaucracy and implementing a service performance ratings system, the government can enhance transparency, promote accountability, and restore public trust. More importantly, these reforms can create a business-friendly environment that strengthens Malaysia’s overall competitiveness.”

Clause 6 of the Bill, which mandates government entities to review and reduce regulatory burdens by at least 25% every three years, is particularly commendable. Regulatory excess has long been a concern for businesses and consumers, stifling innovation and economic progress. Reducing unnecessary red tape will not only improve Malaysia’s business environment but also ensure a more consumer-friendly regulatory framework, making the country a more attractive destination for investment and entrepreneurship.

Furthermore, the introduction of a service performance ratings system under Clause 7 is a crucial step in monitoring the effectiveness and efficiency of government entities. This will encourage continuous improvement and provide the public with measurable insights into service delivery, ensuring that businesses and individuals benefit from a more responsive and efficient administration.

“The implementation of regular performance assessments and public reporting is essential in ensuring that government agencies remain accountable and efficient. Additionally, allowing state government entities to voluntarily submit performance reports enhances the culture of transparency and fosters competition in service delivery. A government tjrprioritizes efficiency and responsiveness will ultimately improve Malaysia’s ability to compete on a regional and global scale,” added Tarmizi.

The Bill represents an opportunity to tackle inefficiencies that hinder business growth. By streamlining administrative processes and fostering a results-driven public sector, Malaysia can create a more conducive environment for businesses and consumers alike.

The Consumer Choice Center urges the government to ensure the effective implementation of these measures, with clear benchmarks and public engagement mechanisms to guarantee meaningful outcomes. A transparent, efficient, and accountable public administration will not only enhance Malaysia’s international reputation but also improve economic opportunities and competitiveness.

Minimum Courier Charge Increase: Who is the Government Protecting?

KUALA LUMPUR, 27th February 2025—The Consumer Choice Center Malaysia, through its representative, Tarmizi Anuwar, has questioned the government’s decision to implement the Reference Price Guidelines for courier services, which take effect on 1 December 2024. These guidelines recommend increasing the minimum price for deliveries under 2kg from RM4.00 to RM5.00.

Deputy Minister of Communications Teo Nie Ching, recently stated that these guidelines are not mandatory and merely serve as a reference for the industry. However, Tarmizi argues that while they may not be legally binding, such guidelines still harm the market and consumers.

“Although the government claims this is just a guideline and not a mandatory directive, courier companies can use these recommended prices to justify raising their service charges. This will burden consumers, especially small businesses and online sellers who rely on competitive shipping costs,” said Tarmizi.

He also emphasized that this move reduces competition in the market, as courier companies will no longer be incentivized to offer lower prices to attract customers. This deprives consumers of the opportunity to access cheaper services and negatively impacts the growth of the e-commerce industry.

Additionally, these guidelines do not encourage improvements in service quality. “If courier companies are not required to compete on pricing, they may be less motivated to enhance efficiency and service quality. In the end, consumers will not only pay more but also fail to receive the service improvements they deserve,” he added.

A study by Blackbox Research, titled Grasping the E-Commerce Opportunity in Southeast Asia, also found that delivery timeliness and high costs remain major concerns in rural areas, directly affecting the efficiency of e-commerce operations and consumer satisfaction in Malaysia.

“With the increase in the minimum delivery charge, rural consumers, especially in remote areas like Sabah and Sarawak, where logistical access is already limited, will face even higher costs without any guarantee of improved services,” he noted.“This move not only raises costs for consumers but also does not ensure any enhancement in service quality. Therefore, policies that focus more on competition and innovation within the courier industry should be prioritized to ensure more efficient and affordable services for consumers,” he concluded.

Harsh Regulations Create More Harm than Good

Kuala Lumpur, 28 November 2024 – Since the announcement of Act 852 regulations by the Ministry of Health (MOH), the retail industry has pleaded for the government to be sensitive to their financial burdens whilst state authorities are considering making rules that are not aligned to MOH national regulations. In our view, this has created a regulatory environment that will impact public health, consumer safety, and the retail sector. The Consumer Choice Center (CCC), a global consumer advocacy group, calls for a re-evaluation of this policy to ensure it does not inadvertently harm consumers or fuel illicit trade.

Bans Do Not Reduce Risks

CCC believes MOH’s retail display ban risks jeopardizing public health goals. The visibility and accessibility of vape products are crucial in encouraging smokers to transition to less harmful options. Not being able to browse vape products at retail outlets risks motivating adult smokers to purchase cigarettes, a product they have more familiarity yet have more serious health implications.

In addition, remind the government that every consumer has a right to information as stated in Consumer Protection Act 1999 (CPA). There should not be a case where key product information such as content or ingredients, quality certifications, and other product descriptions. 

Consumer Safety Concerns

“Illicit markets don’t play by the rules. They don’t verify age, and their products are often dangerous to consumer,” said Tarmizi Anuwar, the Malaysia Country Associate for the Consumer Choice Center.

Regulated vape products are a key tool for harm reduction. Providing adult smokers with less harmful alternatives to quit combustible cigarettes is key to achieve public health goals. We urge authorities to consider scientific data before applying drastic measures to a whole industry. 

A 2023 study by the Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM), titled Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Level and Practices among Tobacco and Nicotine Adult Users in Klang Valley, Malaysia, found that 68.2% of respondents successfully transitioned from smoking to vaping. This study further highlights that users of vape products exhale far fewer harmful aerosols, posing less risk to bystanders compared to cigarette smoke. Additionally, a 2024 study “Quitting Strong: New Zealand’s Smoking Cessation Success Story” found cigarettes to be 10 times more dangerous than vape. 

Economic and Market Concerns

CCC urges the government to be sensitive toward the retail industry. Costs incurred in making alterations to a retail premise as well as the possibility of reduced income due to the inability of customers to easily browse smoking products in a multi-category retail store will have significant financial impact.  

Recommendations for Policymakers

  1. Allow Retails Display of Approved Products: Consider controlled product displays such as restricting public access by placing them behind the point-of-sale. Enforce age-verification, sale of only MOH approved products.
  2. Support Harm Reduction Efforts: Recognize vape as an alternate nicotine product that is a tool for reducing smoking-related illnesses.
  3. Collaborate with Stakeholders: Involve businesses, consumers, and public health advocates to develop sustainable policies.

The Consumer Choice Center stands ready to work with federal and state governments to develop comprehensive regulations that prioritize public health while preserving consumer access to safer alternatives.

Outrage over outage: Online banking users call for better communication, security

KUALA LUMPUR: Users are overwhelmingly frustrated by the frequent online banking services outages and demand stronger security measures and clearer communication from financial institutions (FIs).

Industry observers believe the recent disruptions in online banking services by two of Malaysia’s largest banks call for more proactive security measures and transparent communication strategies from FIs.

Consumers Association of Penang (CAP) president Mohideen Abdul Kader said FIs often have a “kill switch”, a security feature that allows account holders to instantly block their internet banking access, accounts and cards if they suspect they are victims of a scam or that their login credentials have been compromised.

“Some FIs also offer a temporary kill switch to deactivate credit cards when they are not in use. FIs should display a message if there is an outage or anything concerning online services to prevent unnecessary worry for their customers, who might otherwise fear that their devices have been compromised,” he added.

Read the full text here

Vape Product Display Ban Harms Public Health Efforts

KUALA LUMPUR, 11th June 2024 — The Malaysian Consumer Choice Center (MCCC), represented by Tarmizi Anuwar, highlighted significant public health concerns related to the possibility of a ban on the display of vaping products. This regulation, while well-intentioned, may inadvertently undermine efforts to reduce smoking-related harms and improve public health outcomes in Malaysia.

“By banning the display of vape products, the government risks reducing awareness about less harmful alternatives to traditional cigarettes. Vaping is widely recognized as a safer option compared to smoking, and restricting its visibility can prevent smokers from learning about these alternatives. This could slow down the vital transition from smoking to vaping, a key harm reduction strategy,” stated Tarmizi.

He further highlighted that visual exposure to vape products in retail environments plays a crucial role in encouraging smokers to consider switching. “When vape products are not displayed, smokers may miss out on opportunities to explore and understand these alternatives, thus continuing their more harmful smoking habits,” he explained.

The MCCC also fears that the display ban could contribute to the stigmatization of vaping. “Equating vaping with illegal or highly dangerous substances through such bans can discourage smokers from considering it as a legitimate cessation tool. This is counterproductive to public health efforts aimed at reducing smoking rates,” Anuwar remarked.

He added that new users who could benefit from switching to vaping might face additional challenges. “Without the ability to see and compare vape products, individuals might find it difficult to even start their journey towards quitting smoking, thereby missing out on potentially life-saving alternatives,” he stated.

Additionally, Tarmizi Anuwar pointed out the potential rise in black market activity. “Restricting the legal display of vape products can drive consumers towards unregulated and potentially dangerous alternatives. This underground market growth poses significant risks, as these products may not adhere to safety standards, increasing the likelihood of exposure to harmful substances,” he cautioned.

Moreover, the economic impact on the legal sector of specialized vape shops cannot be ignored. “These businesses rely on product displays to attract and inform customers. Banning displays could negatively affect their operations, reducing their ability to serve as resources for smokers seeking alternatives,” he noted.

In conclusion, Tarmizi Anuwar and the Malaysia Consumer Choice Center call on the Malaysian Government to reconsider the vape product display ban. “We urge policymakers to consider the broader implications on public health and to seek balanced regulations that protect youth while enabling adult smokers to access and learn about safer alternatives. Harm reduction and informed choice should be at the forefront of our public health strategy,” he concluded.

Larangan paparan produk vape hadkan akses pengguna

Baru-baru ini terdapat satu cadangan daripada The Partnership for Healthy Cities untuk melaksanakan larangan paparan produk tembakau dan vape di peringkat pihak berkuasa tempatan (PBT), khususnya melibatkan Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL). 

Mungkin bunyinya murni iaitu untuk melindungi orang ramai daripada bahaya merokok, namun cadangan tersebut memerlukan analisis secara objektif untuk memahami potensi akibatnya.

Melaksanakan larangan paparan produk vape memberi kesan ketara kepada kesedaran dan pilihan pengguna. 

Menyembunyikan produk itu menyekat keupayaan pengguna untuk membandingkan pelbagai jenama, perisa dan tahap nikotin yang merupakan faktor penting untuk membuat keputusan termaklum. 

Bagi perokok yang ingin beralih kepada alternatif yang kurang mudarat, larangan berkenaan boleh memudaratkan.

Selain itu, larangan paparan juga menghalang keupayaan mereka untuk mengakses maklumat dengan mudah tentang pilihan perisa berbeza yang tersedia, sekali gus merumitkan pengguna mencari produk yang sesuai dengan keperluan mereka. 

Akhirnya, ia menghalang objektif kesihatan awam yang bertujuan untuk mengurangkan kadar merokok melalui promosi vape sebagai alternatif yang lebih selamat.

Lebih membimbangkan lagi, larangan itu juga mungkin bercanggah dengan undang-undang. Perkara 75 Perlembagaan Persekutuan menetapkan bahawa undang-undang persekutuan mengatasi undang-undang negeri dalam kes-kes yang tidak konsisten.

Dengan tiadanya klausa dalam Rang Undang-Undang Kawalan Produk Merokok Untuk Kesihatan Awam 2023 yang melarang paparan produk tembakau, pelaksanaan larangan berkenaan di peringkat PBT adalah tidak sah dan dianggap bertentangan dengan perlembagaan.

Read the full text here

Display ban products at local council level is unconstitutional

KUALA LUMPUR, 8th May 2024 — The Malaysia Consumer Choice Center (MCCC), represented by Tarmizi Anuwar, has voiced concerns over the proposal by certain groups to implement display bans on tobacco products at the local council level, particularly by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL). He argues that such measures would not only infringe upon consumer autonomy but also contradict the spirit of the Federal Constitution.

Speaking on behalf of the Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi emphasized the importance of preserving consumer autonomy and access to information. “This idea of banning tobacco displays at the local council level is limiting the access of information to smokers, hindering their ability to make informed decisions about their lifestyle and health,” he said.

Highlighting the potential consequences of display bans, Tarmizi pointed out that such measures could curb product innovation and competition in the market. “”Display bans that hide prices not only obscure consumer choice but also distort competition in the market. When consumers cannot easily compare prices, it hampers the competitive landscape and undermines the principles of free and fair market dynamics. Transparency in pricing is essential for fostering healthy competition and empowering consumers to make informed purchasing decisions,” he explained.

Furthermore, Tarmizi raised concerns about the legality of enacting such bans at the local council level. He referenced Article 75 of the Federal Constitution, which stipulates that federal laws prevail over state laws in cases of inconsistency. “The Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Bill 2023 does not include any clause to prohibit the display of tobacco products. Therefore, implementing display bans at the local government level would contradict federal law and be void,” he asserted.

He called for policymakers to reject the proposal to ban tobacco displays at the local council level, urging policymakers to prioritize consumer choice, access to information, and adherence to constitutional principles.

In addition, Tarmizi emphasized the importance of empowering consumers through education in harm reduction and awareness campaigns instead of resorting to restrictive regulatory measures like display bans. “We need to adopt an alternative that is much safer and proven effective for people who want to stop smoking. A study titled Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation written by Hartmann-Boyce, J et al. (2022) found that vaping helps people quit smoking. This systematic review of 78 studies involved a total of 22,052 participants and said there is definite evidence that electronic cigarettes with nicotine increase the quit rate compared to nicotine replacement therapy and moderate certainty evidence that they increase the quit rate compared to electronic cigarettes without nicotine,” he said.

He also highlighted that consumers equipped with knowledge are more likely to make conscious decisions about tobacco and vape products, ultimately reducing the need for heavy-handed regulatory interventions. “Education and awareness campaigns empower consumers to take control of their health and well-being, without sacrificing their freedom of choice,” he concluded.

CCC highlights nutritional value while debunking misconceptions on palm oil

THE Consumer Choice Centre (CCC), a non-profit consumer advocacy group, has shed some light on the health benefits of palm oil and its valuable role in enhancing the nutritional quality of food products.

Despite misconceptions surrounding its impact on health, the CCC stressed that palm oil offers numerous benefits and serves as a versatile and essential ingredient in Malaysia’s food industry.

The CCC further pointed out that palm oil is rich in tocotrienols – a form of vitamin E with powerful antioxidant properties which help to protect cells from damage caused by free radicals.

A study by the Nutrition Society Malaysia shows that palm oil contains Vitamin E known as tocols that comprised tocopherols and tocotrienols as well as carotenoids which are important components for healthy nutrition which supports heart heath, reduces inflammation and enhances cognitive function, among other benefits.

Read the full text here

Introducing a licensing system for selected shops selling vapes will make it difficult for consumers to access safer products

KUALA LUMPUR, 18th March 2024 – As the Malaysian government contemplates the implementation of a licensing system for selected shops selling vaping products, the Consumer Choice Center (CCC) voices concern over the potential consequences on consumer access to safer vaping alternatives. With a mission to promote consumer choice and empower individuals, CCC emphasizes the importance of preserving access to diverse and high-quality vaping products for informed consumer decision-making.

The proposed licensing system, while aiming to address concerns surrounding vaping, may inadvertently hinder access to safer vaping options for consumers. CCC underscores the necessity of balanced regulation that prioritizes both public health objectives and consumer choice. By restricting the availability of licensed vape shops, consumers may face limited options, potentially resorting to less regulated or unsafe alternatives.

Representative of the Malaysian Consumer Choice Center, Tarmizi Anuwar stated, “Introducing a licensing system for selected vape shops could inadvertently push consumers towards unregulated channels, undermining public health objectives. We advocate for policies that empower consumers with access to a variety of safer vaping products while ensuring appropriate regulatory oversight.”

“Accessibility to access alternative products is very important to help consumers quit smoking. The selective store licensing system only makes it difficult for consumers to access safer products and tends to return to smoking and the black market.”

The Consumer Choice Center stresses the importance of transparency and consumer involvement in the formulation of regulatory measures concerning vaping products. As such, CCC emphasizes the necessity for the Ministry of Health to publicly disclose the regulatory details of any proposed vape regulations.

“This transparency would enable consumers to provide feedback and express their concerns regarding the potential impact on accessibility and product diversity. By soliciting input from the individuals directly affected by these regulations, policymakers can ensure that any proposed measures align with consumer preferences and prioritize public health objectives effectively,” he said.

Commenting further on the proposed regulation of vape, the Tarmizi underscores the importance of embracing technological neutrality. By recognizing the diverse array of nicotine delivery products available on the market, including open, closed, or disposable vapes, heated tobacco, and oral nicotine, policymakers can foster an environment that promotes consumer choice and encourages innovation.


“Technological neutrality guarantees freedom of choice by not forcing consumers or companies to use any particular technology. The use of specific technologies will discriminate against other technologies to the point of increasing operating costs and the price of final goods. Furthermore, it makes it difficult for consumers to access and buy vapes or alternative products that are less harmful and cheaper” he concluded.

Cut plastic waste with tax incentives for private R&D, says NGO

A consumer group has suggested tax incentives for companies and consumers as part of efforts to reduce plastic waste, especially those targeted at research and development (R&D) in the private sector.

Tarmizi Anuwar, the Malaysian representative of the Washington-based Consumer Choice Centre, said that emphasis on private sector R&D could lead to the production of cheaper sustainable alternatives.

“Incentives do not necessarily mean grants. If a company or the private sector invests in R&D, the government should give tax exemptions or at least reduce taxes for them,” he told FMT.

Tarmizi said these measures should be complemented by reduced trade barriers for the import of alternatives as well as reduced bureaucracy, streamlining patent processes for sustainable products.

Read the full text here

en_USEN

Follow us

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

OTTAWA

718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5

© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER

Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org