fbpx

Author: Consumer Choice Center

Das sind Europas beste und schlechteste Bahnhöfe

Spoiler: Zürich macht wieder einmal alles richtig. Das zeigt das neuste Ranking einer internationalen Verbraucherschutzorganisation. In Deutschland sieht die Lage etwas anders aus.

«Ich verstehe nur Bahnhof.» Wer das sagt, meint, dass er etwas nicht versteht. Das Sprichwort stammt laut Duden möglicherweise aus dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Deutsche Soldaten wollten demnach nur noch nach Hause und würgten Gespräche, die sich nicht um einen Fronturlaub drehten, mit dieser Redewendung ab.

Wer heute an europäischen Bahnhöfen wartet, will oft auch nur nach Hause. Wie schnell und unproblematisch das geht, hängt von vielerlei Faktoren ab. Die internationale Verbraucherschutzorganisation Consumer Choice Center (CCC) hat bereits zum vierten Mal ein Ranking der passagierfreundlichsten Bahnhöfe Europas erstellt. Dabei wurden die nach Fahrgastaufkommen grössten Bahnhöfe Europas bewertet. 

Verschiedene Kriterien flossen in den European-Railway-Station-Index ein: der Prozentsatz der verspäteten Züge, Wartezeiten, die Direktverbindungen, die Qualität der Apps, die Sauberkeit der Toiletten oder die Erreichbarkeit und Überfüllung der Bahnsteige.

Read the full text here

Das ist der schlechteste Bahnhof Europas

Achtung, eine Durchsage: Die Rangliste der kundenfreundlichsten europäischen Bahnhöfe fährt in diesem Jahr in umgekehrter Wagenreihung. Deutschland belegt die letzten sechs Plätze.

Sinnvoll beschilderte Bahnsteige, saubere Toiletten oder der bestens sortierte Buchladen: Was Reisende an Bahnhöfen am meisten schätzen, variiert nach persönlichen Vorlieben. Was aber alle hassen: unpünktliche Züge, schlechte Verbindungen – und mangelnden Komfort.

Im Ranking der passagierfreundlichsten Bahnhöfe Europas wurde nun deutlich, wo die Reisenden sich besonders wohlfühlen – und wo sie vermutlich froh sind, wenn der Zug sich in Bewegung setzt. An der Spitze des European Railway Station Index 2023  steht der Hauptbahnhof von Zürich. Er erreichte 102 Punkte in der Gesamtwertung, die sich aus diversen Aspekten zusammensetzt.

Zu den Kriterien zählen unter anderem Wartezeiten, der Zugang zu den Gleisen, der Zustand von Sanitäranlagen und Lounges und die Öffnungszeiten der Ticketschalter. Aber auch der Anschluss an andere Bahnhöfe spielte eine Rolle sowie das Ausmaß an »Scherereien, um in andere Länder zu reisen «. Analysiert wurden 50 der nach Passagiervolumen größten Bahnhöfe Europas.

Read the full text here

Drei Berliner Bahnhöfe unter europäischen Schlusslichtern

Während ein Berliner Bahnhof überzeugt, landen drei andere unter den Schlusslichtern: Der aktuelle „Europäische Bahnhofsindex“ kommt für die großen Stationen in der Hauptstadt zu ganz unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen. Für den Index hat das Consumer Choice Center, eine internationale Verbraucherschutz-Organisation, bereits zum vierten Mal die 50 europäischen Bahnhöfe mit den meisten Reisenden miteinander verglichen. Wie schon im letzten Ranking landet der Berliner Hauptbahnhofunter den am besten bewerteten Stationen.

In die Auswertung eingeflossen sind Faktoren wie die Barrierefreiheit, die Verfügbarkeit von kostenlosem Wlan, die Anzahl an Geschäften und Restaurants im Bahnhof, die Möglichkeit, auf direktem Weg ins Ausland zu reisen, oder die Umsteigeoptionen auf andere Verkehrsmittel wie Straßen- und U-Bahnen. Obwohl unter den 50 betrachteten Bahnhöfen 21 aus Deutschland stammen, hat es allein Berlins Hauptbahnhof unter die Top 5 geschafft: Nur die Hauptbahnhöfe in Zürich und Wien wurden noch besser bewertet. Als einzige weitere deutsche Station unter den besten Zehn ist Frankfurts Hauptbahnhof.

Read the full text here

Réaffirmer la neutralité suisse: le cas de l’énergie

À l’étranger, on caricature souvent la Suisse par sa seule neutralité. Cette description devrait nous interroger, car elle reflète sans doute plus qu’une simple philosophie de relations internationales.

Cette neutralité transparaît dans notre relation à la politique. La population suisse voit ses hommes politiques comme les garants d’un cadre général et non comme des sauveurs qui permettront de réorienter la nation dans la bonne direction. Vue de l’extérieur, la politique suisse est moins conflictuelle, plus tournée vers la discussion et la recherche de solutions. 

Toutefois, il y a des sujets qui semblent échapper à ce principe. C’est notamment le cas de la politique énergétique, qui est devenue un sujet passionnel. Il y a des pro et des antinucléaires, des pro et des antisolaires, sans parler des éoliennes, qui détruisent le paysage ou sauvent la planète. Choisis ton camp, camarade!

La neutralité énergétique devrait être la solution que nous devrions défendre collectivement au niveau politique. Ce principe repose sur la flexibilité et l’acceptation des différentes solutions possibles, afin de maintenir un approvisionnement en énergie fiable et durable tout en préservant l’environnement. La diversification des sources d’énergie est capitale pour garantir notre prospérité.

Cependant, ces dernières années, la politique énergétique suisse a pris un tournant controversé avec la mise en œuvre de la politique énergétique 2050, qui est en rupture avec l’histoire de notre pays.

Read the full text here

Health equity and trial diversity questions still not answered by pharma

While global players are more aware of health equity problems across the world, there are still lingering problems, according to Access to Medicine Foundation CEO Jayasree Iyer.

Speaking at the panel discussion ‘Health Equity – How Can Pharma Make a Difference?’ on the last day of the FT Global Pharma and Biotech Summit in London, UK, Iyer highlighted that commercial and access incentives need to be put together to improve health equity.

Seyda Atadan Memis, general manager of the UK and Ireland at Takeda, noted that while focusing on patients and building trust is crucial, it is also important to address affordability questions in each country.

Memis also said that health equity goes along with ethical considerations inside clinical trials. Takeda has translated its clinical trial guidelines into multiple languages for potential participants and caregivers to improve diversity and representation.

Clinical Trials Arena has previously reported on the importance of including patients from racially diverse backgrounds, improving female representation in early-stage studies, and the inclusion of the pregnant population and patients with cognitive disabilities.

Even though data plays a crucial role in the drug development process, it may also affect diversity. Liz Hampson, executive director of Europe at Deloitte Health Equity Institute, explained that biased data used to pick which products should enter clinical trials will influence what cohorts are enrolled into trials.

Read the full text here

Biden’s Plan for ‘Digital Equity’ Will Soon Lead to Government  Micromanaging ‘Nearly Every Aspect’ of the Internet, FCC Commissioner Warns

‘In the guise of “digital equity,” President Biden has called for the FCC to exercise a degree of control over Internet services and infrastructure that we have never seen before,’ an FCC commissioner tells the Sun.

The Biden administration may soon implement sweeping regulations that would give it control of the internet, analysts are warning ahead of the Federal Communications Commission’s November 15 vote on the proposed rules. 

“In the guise of ‘digital equity,’ President Biden has called for the FCC to exercise a degree of control over Internet services and infrastructure that we have never seen before,” an FCC commissioner, Brendan Carr, tells the Sun in an email. 

“It will give the Administrative State the power to micromanage nearly every aspect of how the Internet works,” he adds. “These types of command and control regulations will only make it harder for Internet infrastructure and services to be built out and could make our networks look more like the sluggish networks that consumers in Europe have to deal with.”

The Democratic-controlled FCC says the new rules would “prevent discrimination in access to broadband services based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, and national origin.”

“We recognize that the ultimate goal of this proceeding is to facilitate equal access to broadband just as the law says,” the FCC chairwoman, Jessica Rosenworcel, says

Read the full text here

Eglė Markevičiūtė Appointed Head Of Digital And Innovation Policy At Consumer Choice Center

Brussels, BE – The Consumer Choice Center (CCC), a global consumer advocacy group, announces the appointment of Eglė Markevičiūtė, former Lithuanian Deputy Minister of Economy and Innovation, as Head of Digital and Innovation Policy. In her new role, Markevičiūtė will spearhead innovative consumer policies in the digital, innovation, and communication realm, shaping digital policy advocacy for the CCC.

Markevičiūtė, with her background in digital and innovation policy management, as well as public affairs, expressed her enthusiasm for the opportunity, “I am honored to join the Consumer Choice Center and contribute to advocacy for consumer and competition-oriented digital, communication & innovation policies across the globe. The consumer-centric approach needs to become a bigger priority for global policymakers. We need a more transparent and inclusive ex-post analysis of regulation for the most innovative sectors, and if liberal democracies take the global innovation race seriously, we must address the fact that we have to focus not only on risk prevention and careful planning but also on calculated risk-taking.”

Consumer Choice Center Managing Director Fred Roeder expressed his excitement about Markevičiūtė joining the team, saying, “We are thrilled to have Eglė Markevičiūtė on board as our Head of Digital and Innovation Policy. Her expertise and passion for consumer advocacy align perfectly with our mission. Her appointment will undoubtedly strengthen CCC’s footprint on digital and innovation policies across the globe. We believe her insights will be invaluable in shaping policies that prioritize consumer choice, innovation, and digital rights.”

Markevičiūtė brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the CCC, having served in key positions within the Lithuanian government. Her appointment marks a significant step for the organization, reaffirming its commitment to empowering consumers in the digital era.

Consumer Choice Center is a global consumer advocacy group dedicated to promoting competition and choice in the marketplace. With Markevičiūtė leading the digital policy efforts, the organization is poised to make a substantial impact on consumer rights and innovation in the digital space.


About the Consumer Choice Center

The Consumer Choice Center is a global consumer advocacy group that empowers consumers to promote competition, choice, and consumer freedom. We stand up for consumer choice in the digital age, ensuring consumers can access innovative products, services, and technologies that enhance their lives. For more information, visit consumerchoicecenter.org.

About Eglė Markevičiūtė

Eglė Markevičiūtė is a seasoned expert in economic and innovation affairs. She previously served as the Deputy Minister of Economy and Innovation in Lithuania, where she played a key role in shaping policies to foster innovation and digital reforms. With her expertise in digital and innovation policies, Markevičiūtė is well-positioned to drive consumer-centric initiatives in the digital sphere.

About Fred Roeder

Fred Roeder is the Managing Director of the Consumer Choice Center. He is a passionate advocate for consumer rights, free markets, and digital innovation. Under his leadership, Consumer Choice Center has become a leading voice in the global consumer advocacy landscape.

Biden called upon by pro-growth groups to withdraw CFPB’s late fees rule

A coalition of groups is calling for the Biden administration to withdraw the new rule put forward by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to impose a stricter cap on credit card late fees, arguing the regulation will hurt consumers and economic growth.

In a letter sent to President Biden and CFPB Director Rohit Chopra, as well as Congress’ banking, financial services and small business committees, the 30 signatory groups outlined their “strong opposition” to the late fees rule. The Biden administration’s rule would reduce the safe harbor dollar amount that credit card issuers can charge in late fees from up to $41 to $8. The rule would also eliminate the automatic inflation adjustment to that amount and ban late fees amounting to more than 25% of the consumer’s required credit card payment.

“At the White House this month, President Biden touted the rule, alleging it would give the most vulnerable Americans among us a much-needed break,” the groups wrote. “This isn’t true. A stricter price cap will harm not only small businesses and the economy at large but also the low-income workers that the administration is intending to help. History indicates that consumers are the ones who bear the brunt of regulations like this one because, to offset the resulting costs, financial institutions ultimately impose new fees and higher interest rates while reducing Main Street’s credit access.”

The groups also raised concerns about the rule’s impact on smaller financial institutionsthat rely more heavily on fees to cover the costs of extending credit to consumers.

In its announcement of the proposed rule, the CFPB said that it “preliminarily found that late fee income exceeds associated collection costs by a factor of five” and that because credit card issuers can currently charge up to $41 for late fees, a “late fee of $8 would be sufficient for most issuers to cover collection costs incurred as a result of late payments.”

Read the full text here

CCC Joins 31 Group Coalition Letter Against New CFPB Regulatory Assault

Washington, D.C.: In response to President Biden promoting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new credit card late fee price cap at the White House last week, the Consumer Choice Center signed a coalition letter to the president and the CFPB urging them to reconsider the rule. The letter is signed by 31 groups and advocacy organizations dedicated to promoting pro-growth, pro-consumer policies.

 
“History indicates that consumers are the ones who bear the brunt of regulations like this one because, to offset the resulting costs, financial institutions ultimately impose new fees and higher interest rates while reducing Main Street’s credit access,” the letter stated, “For instance, the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act capping interchange fees on debit cards led to the elimination of free checking accounts, raised minimum balance requirements, and increased maintenance fees. Your new late fee cap will similarly increase financial institutions’ operational costs, which American consumers will again inevitably bear.”

The letter also highlighted how the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy noted the CFPB refused to “properly consider the impact this rule will have on small entities” despite courts holding that agencies must do so before certifying a rulemaking. 

CC’ed on the letter were Sens. Sherrod Brown and Tim Scott (Chair/Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs); Reps. Patrick McHenry and Maxine Waters (Chair/Ranking Member of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee), and Reps. Roger Williams/Nydia Velázquez (Chair/Ranking Member of the U.S. House Small Business Committee).
 
The letter’s signatories include Ed Martin, Phyllis Schlafly Eagles; Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform; John Berlau, Competitive Enterprise Institute; Cameron Shelby, Heartland Impact; Brent M. Gardner, Americans for Prosperity; Karen Kerrigan, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council; Tom Schatz, Citizens Against Government Waste; Gerard Scimeca, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy; Brian Garst, Center for Freedom & Prosperity; Isaac Schick, American Consumer Institute; Stephen Kent, Consumer Choice Center; Patrick Brennen, Southwest Policy Institute; Hadley Heath Manning, Independent Women’s Voice; Terry Schilling, American Principles Project; George Landrith, Frontiers of Freedom; Saul Anuzis, 60 Plus Association; David Williams, Taxpayers Protection Alliance; Paul Gessig, Rio Grande Foundation; Jeff Mazzella, Center for Individual Freedom; Ryan Ellis, Center for a Free Economy; Phil Kerpen, American Commitment; Seton Motley, Less Government; Dan Perrin, HSA Coalition; Chuck Muth, Citizen Outreach; Wendy Darmon, Palmetto Promise Institute; Judson Phillips, Tea Party Nation; Richard Manning, Americans for Limited Government; Carol Platt Liebau, Yankee Institute; Marcos Lopez, Nevada Policy Institute; Mike Stenhouse, Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity; and Sal Nuzzo, James Madison Institute. 


You can view the letter HERE.


Tabling of GEG bill postponed again?

Questions abound over the tabling of the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Bill 2023 for its second reading in the Dewan Rakyat tomorrow.

This comes after a health ministry briefing for MPs, scheduled to be held at 5pm today, was postponed indefinitely.

The health ministry has also postponed a media briefing on the bill scheduled for this afternoon in Parliament. No reasons were given for the postponement.

A source close to the matter told FMT that the tabling of the bill has been postponed.

At the time of publication, health minister Dr Zaliha Mustafa and the ministry’s communication team have yet to respond to queries on whether the tabling of the bill, also known as the Generational End Game (GEG) bill, had been postponed.

Last week, Zaliha announced that the Cabinet had decided that the bill would be tabled for its second reading on Oct 10.

The GEG bill seeks to ban the use, purchase and sale of cigarettes and vape products to those born after 2007.

Read the full text here

Scroll to top
en_USEN