Global Gene Editing Regulation Index

Despite the innovations already in place, and with a tsunami of discoveries coming every month, gene editing represents an immense public policy challenge. With new technologies come ideological opponents to innovation. Environmental groups suspicious of technology, court cases and regulations passed over the objections of the science community, particularly in Europe, are already maneuvering to stifle innovation. Our job as advocates for choice and science will continue to be making the case for the Innovation Principle—allowing scientists and scientific agencies to make determinations of efficacy and safety, and not being at the mercy of the theatre of our broken political process.

This index illustrates the existing differences in regulation for gene editing in plants, animals and humans and the frameworks for gene drives. The index was created to help journalists, regulators, and policy-makers understand how their actions can help or stifle innovation.

This index has been compiled by using the thorough and important analysis done by scientist Dr. Kayleen Schreiber with the Genetic Literacy Project in collaboration with the Consumer Choice Center.
 
We would like to thank Jon Entine, executive director of the GLP, for his work in promoting biotechnology education and for his support and encouragement for creating these invaluable tools.

REPORT

COLORS AND RATINGS GUIDE

Regulation StatusRating
Determined: No Unique Regulations*10
Lightly Regulated8
Proposed: No Unique Regulations**6
Ongoing Research, Regulations In Development5
Highly Regulated4
Mostly Prohibited2
Limited Research, No Clear Regulations1
Prohibited0
Crops/Food:
Gene editing of plants and food products. Research and development has mostly focused on disease resistance, drought resistance, and increasing yield, but more recent advances have produced low trans-fat oils and high-fiber grains.
 
Animals:
Gene editing of animals, not including animal research for human drugs and therapies. Fewer gene edited animals have been developed than gene edited crops, but scientists have developed hornless and heat-tolerant cattle and fast-growing tilapia may soon be the first gene edited animal to be consumed.
 
*Gene editing regulated under existing legislation with no unique restrictions, except Argentina, which passed new, flexible regulations. / **Decrees under consideration, but not yet passed, to regulate gene-edited crops or animals as conventional.

Human and Agricultural Gene Editing Regulations

Country / Region Food / Crops Animals Ag Rating
Japan 10 10 10
Brazil 10 10 10
Argentina 10 10 10
Canada 8 8 8
Australia 8 8 8
Israel 10 5 7.5
US 10 4 7
Russia 6 6 6
Central America 6 6 6
Paraguay 6 6 6
Uruguay 6 6 6
Chile 10 1 5.5
China 5 5 5
Africa 5 5 5
New Zealand 4 4 4
India 4 4 4
UK 2 2 2
EU 2 2 2
Ukraine 1 1 1
Mexico 1 1 1

MEDIA HITS

en_USEN

Follow us

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

OTTAWA

718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5

© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER

Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org