Day: November 13, 2024

Consumers deserve ‘auto choice’ to bring down insurance costs

Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Choice Center today launched its policy primer offering simple reforms to provide for more competitive, reasonable, and accurate insurance rates to increase choice and lower costs for consumers.

The primer, Fixing What’s Broken: Practical Consumer-Friendly Insurance Reforms to Save Money, focuses on two pressing issues for American consumers. First, it analyzes how insurance providers can adapt to the emerging scientific reality of tobacco harm reduction and consumer trends toward less harmful nicotine alternatives to smoking. Second, this primer explains different models for structuring consumer auto insurance and suggests how costly legal battles can be minimized, in turn lowering costs and premiums.

Yaël Ossowski, Deputy Director at the Consumer Choice Center, commented on the auto insurance policy recommendations, saying, The legal nightmare that comes with every fender bender or more serious auto injury is known to every American, as they’re reminded by the slew of injury lawyer billboards on the interstate. Rather than subjecting every auto incident to a lawyer-led process that inevitably raises premiums, states and insurance firms should give consumers the right to choose whether they would prefer a tort or no-fault insurance model as is practiced in other countries and states.” 

Attempts at legislation to offer “auto choice” to consumers have been introduced in all levels of state and federal government over the years, but have consistently been opposed by well-funded injury lawyers who see a threat to their business.

For too long, we’ve allowed car insurance costs to balloon because of the adversarial nature of our highly litigious justice system, rather than understanding that most other countries do not force drivers into court after each accident. Giving auto insurance consumers the ability to choose between a no-fault and a tort system would allow flexibility, remove the adversarial declaration of liability that inflates lawsuits, and allows companies to compete for our business with the best policies and plans available. Best of all, good drivers with clean records would benefit from substantially lower premiums and simple plans,” added Ossowski.

Giving consumers the choice between a plan that requires legal negotiations between insurance companies to find blame and assign penalties, and a no-fault model that prioritizes quick and easy payouts without liability is a no-brainer that would bring immediate savings to consumers’ monthly premiums.

“Guided by state insurance commissioners, firms should offer alternatives to liability plans and allow consumers to choose the plan that works best for them as a perfect middle ground between enabling choice and reducing legal costs and headaches,” concluded Ossowski.

The policy primer can be read in full HERE.

###


The Consumer Choice Center is an independent, nonpartisan consumer advocacy group championing the benefits of freedom of choice, innovation, and abundance in everyday life for consumers in over 100 countries. We closely monitor regulatory trends in Washington, Brussels, Ottawa, Brasilia, London, and Geneva. Find out more at www.consumerchoicecenter.org

Read this press release online.

Health and life insurance policies should accept the science on nicotine

Washington, D.C. – Today the Consumer Choice Center launched its policy primer offering simple reforms to provide Americans with more competitive, reasonable, and accurate insurance rates. The result of reform would be more choice and lower costs for consumers in the insurance market. 

The primer, Fixing What’s Broken: Practical Consumer-Friendly Insurance Reforms to Save Money, focuses on two pressing issues for American consumers. First, it analyzes how insurance providers can adapt to the emerging scientific reality of tobacco harm reduction and consumer trends toward less harmful nicotine alternatives to smoking. Second, this primer explains different models for structuring consumer auto insurance and suggests how costly legal battles can be minimized, in turn lowering costs and premiums.

Elizabeth Hicks, US Affairs Analyst at the Consumer Choice Center, commented on the health & life insurance policy recommendations, saying, Anyone who’s ever applied for health or life insurance has had to answer if they use nicotine, and that inevitably leads to higher premiums. But those who use less harmful non-combustible nicotine products such as vaping or pouches don’t face nearly the same risk. Why should they pay the same high premiums as smokers?” 

By discerning the significant differences between traditional tobacco products and non-combustible nicotine alternatives for health and long-term medical costs, insurers and consumers together stand to save millions.

“The health insurance industry, as well as policymakers, should want smokers to cease smoking or switch to less harmful alternatives. Insurance plans are long overdue for accurately calculating risk around nicotine-use and restructuring consumer’s rates,” added Hicks.

Guided by state insurance commissioners, actuarial calculations at insurance firms should be recalibrated to reflect the current scientific reality on tobacco harm reduction, giving smokers an immediate financial incentive to make the switch to less harmful products. It makes no sense to penalize nicotine users who do not use combustible products.

This change would not only reflect scientific consensus, but also promote a better economic calculation on future costs and risk profiles in the healthcare space. It would give more options to insurance firms and spur them to compete for potential customers,” concluded Hicks. 

The policy primer can be read in full HERE.

###


The Consumer Choice Center is an independent, nonpartisan consumer advocacy group championing the benefits of freedom of choice, innovation, and abundance in everyday life for consumers in over 100 countries. We closely monitor regulatory trends in Washington, Brussels, Ottawa, Brasilia, London, and Geneva. Find out more at www.consumerchoicecenter.org

France’s Nicotine Pouch Ban: A Step Backward for Public Health and Consumer Choice

The French Health Minister Geneviève Darrieussecq’s announcement to ban nicotine pouches disregards a valuable tool in the fight against smoking-related disease and, by extension, undermines consumer choice and public health.

The Consumer Choice Center advocates for policies grounded in harm reduction and consumer freedom, both of which are compromised by this ban. Nicotine pouches are proven, safer alternatives that help individuals quit smoking by providing a non-combustible, low-risk source of nicotine, similar to nicotine patches or gums but with greater appeal to adult consumers. Instead of enhancing public health, this decision risks pushing former smokers back to cigarettes or into unregulated markets where quality and safety are unmonitored​​.

Countries that support alternatives like nicotine pouches, alongside vaping products, have made meaningful strides toward lowering smoking rates and related health risks. For instance, smokeless nicotine products have contributed to reduced cancer and smoking-related mortality in Sweden, underscoring the effectiveness of such options in fostering a smoke-free society​.

France has an opportunity to lead with policies that prioritize science and harm reduction, supporting consumer access to less harmful products rather than pushing them out. The Consumer Choice Center urges the French government to revisit this decision and adopt evidence-based policies that align with modern public health goals: fewer smokers, lower health risks, and a true empowerment of consumer choice.

For a healthier future, let’s choose innovation over prohibition.

Ontarians can’t get complacent about the liberalization of alcohol

Many Ontarians are celebrating the new rules that allow them to buy alcohol at big box stores like Costco and at their local convenience store, a practice other provinces and other countries have had for many years. This is a victory to be sure for convenience and consumer choice, but it is important not to become complacent and accept that this is the final victory when it comes to the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO). There is so much more that can be done.

The response from Ontarians has been positive to the new retail rules, and the provincial government should take that as a signal that consumers in this province would be accepting of more changes. For example, why do Ontarians still have to go to the LCBO to buy their vodka, whiskey, and gin? The LCBO remains the exclusive retailer of spirits in the province despite the fact that you can get your 2-4 box of beer from your local Costco. Why can’t you pick up a bottle of gin to make some cocktails for your friends as well? The only real reason seems to be to keep the LCBO feeling special, and to potentially avoid another strike. However, strikes won’t hurt Ontarians as much if they are able to buy their alcohol from places other than the LCBO. This exclusive right to sell spirits doesn’t make much sense, and only serves to inconvenience Ontarians with no real evidence that such exclusivity is necessary. However, the evidence is clear for the positives, allowing for existing private retailers to also carry spirits would generate savings for the province of between $100M – $120M per year.

Another aspect of alcohol retail that Ontarians should continue to push for is changing the model of the LCBO completely. There are two options for this that we can learn about from Alberta and British Columbia. Today, the LCBO boasts 669 retail stores in Ontario and continues to be the wholesale supplier for all private retailers and hospitality venues. The reason is simply no longer clear as to why this is still necessary. Alberta boasts a fully private model which still involves the provincial government: Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis (AGLC) is the legal importer of liquor in Alberta. Manufacturers and suppliers sell their liquor products to private retailers through the AGLC, and licensed retailers then sell that liquor to consumers. No need for government-run retail stores like the LCBO, and the model works: before privatization, there were a total of 208 Alberta Liquor Control Board stores. Today, there are more than 1,500 private retail liquor stores. Alberta is even the only province in Canada to have standalone Costco liquor stores. Alberta revenue from liquor sales transferred to the provincial government has consistently increased since privatization.

In B.C., there are private liquor stores alongside province-run liquor stores, but they do not allow alcohol sales in convenience and grocery stores, although wine is allowed in grocery stores (understandably, given B.C.’s rich wine scene). Although that’s not the best model in terms of consumer convenience, it still allows for private retailers and does not allow the provincially-run department to select the products to be sold to retailers. If a manufacturer or seller is approved, then they are eligible to be bought by retailers through B.C.’s Liquor Distribution Branch (LDB). In Ontario, it is LCBO bureaucrats who decide what is and is not sold on their shelves, and even encourage the extremely inefficient practice of alcohol distributors lobbying individual LCBO store managers to ask the higher ups in the LCBO to stock their product.

This is all evidence that the Government of Ontario should far from congratulate themselves on a mission accomplished. There is so much more that could be done to make the LCBO less present in the lives of Ontarians, thereby making picking up a case of beer more convenient and consumer-friendly. It was not the government of Ontario that one day woke up and decided this is something they wanted to do, it was the push from consumers, everyday Ontarians, that encouraged them to make these present liberalizations a reality. Since it seems the provincial government is ready and willing to make life easier for adults in Ontario when it comes to purchasing alcohol, now is the time to take the next step and truly become a more modernized Ontario.

To read more about this, take a look at the Consumer Choice Center’s latest report, Modernize Ontario.

en_USEN

Follow us

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

OTTAWA

718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5

© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER

Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org