featured

More Alcohol Freedom Means Revenue for Ford

As the election in Ontario moves along, it is timely to reflect on a policy that Premier Doug Ford delivered on, and that is alcohol retail modernization. Consumers in Ontario can now walk into their local Costco or Circle-K and pick up a 2-4 of beer along with their groceries and gas. That’s a big win for consumers who for so long have been treated like children by the bloated LCBO who continue to believe it is their moral duty to save Ontarians from themselves. 

This may sound great, and a win for the Ford government, but there are glaring omissions to alcohol modernization policy that may prove to be big problems as the USA’s’ tariff threat looms. Premier Doug Ford is planning a 22 billion dollar relief program similar to pandemic stimulus to help businesses and Canadians as a result of President Donald Trump’s tariff threat on Canada. It is wise for Premier Ford and all the party leaders to realise that this kind of spending needs to come from somewhere, and that somewhere could be from further modernizing alcohol retail in Ontario. 

Despite the increase of ease for Onarians to buy beer, wine, cider, and ready to drink cocktails, liquor can still not be bought anywhere but the LCBO as it maintains a monopoly on those specific items. Want to pick up a bottle of Scotch to enjoy with your friends at a party this weekend? You certainly can’t get one when you’re at the grocery store trying to buy some snacks. Why give consumers partial convenience and then stroke the LCBO’s ego by giving them complete power over one kind of alcohol? 

Today, the LCBO boasts 669 bloated and inefficient retail stores in Ontario, all of them with the exclusive right to sell liquor. If it seems like a bizarre concept to Ontario policymakers to perhaps stop selling through retail stores owned and operated by the government, or to stop having this outdated and decrepit crown corporation be the only one to sell liquor, they will be comforted to learn that it is already happening successfully. Alberta privatized all liquor sales in 1993 and the results have been excellent.

Alberta’s model maintains their government agency as the wholesaler and that agency marks up the liquor before selling it to private retailers, and that markup is used for various government programs. The retailer is allowed to set whatever price they choose after having paid for the product plus the markup. The government is no longer in the business of running and maintaining inefficient retail stores and having management in silos decide what they should and should not sell. This type of model is shockingly not on the table currently in Ontario, and never really has been. 

The net revenue returned to Alberta from the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis (AGLC) has been much higher post-privatization, in case policymakers needed more of an incentive. The net revenue of liquor sales, or the amount of money that the AGLC transferred to the Government of Alberta, was $825,104,000 in 2022/2023, up from $566,690,000 in 2004/2005 and $405 million in 1993 ($662 million when adjusted for inflation). 

According to a study by University of Waterloo Professor Anindya Sen, the cost savings of Ontario switching to an “Alberta-style model” of private retail sales of spirits while maintaining the wholesale aspect of the process would be exceptional even without a significant rise in liquor sales. An estimate shows that had the Government of Ontario moved to an Alberta-style system between the years of 2012 to 2022 (with respect to selling spirits in a private model), it would have saved the Ontario government between $4.8-$5.8 billion dollars. His estimates further indicate that increases in net income would have been roughly $300 to $360 million dollars from 2019-2022. That’s almost $360 million that could have gone to government programs in a short three year period. 

With a looming tariff threat that has only been kicked down the road for another month, and Premier Ford’s intention to provide Ontarians with COVID-like financial support, the savings from liberalizing alcohol sales in Ontario are getting harder to ignore. These savings will be necessary as Ontario continues to navigate a financial storm, and it is time that the leaders of every party address the further modernization of alcohol and the savings and convenience it brings during this election season. 

The UK Wants a Backdoor into EVERYONE’S Apple Cloud Data

Hide your group chat history. The UK has demanded Apple build a backdoor to its encryption services, giving the British police full key access to any Apple consumer’s content stored on the cloud.

And yes that means Apple users everywhere. Not just specific British users, but you, me, and every boomer with an iPhone. And if they comply with the British on this, Apple won’t even be permitted to warn consumers that the security of data doesn’t include security from the British government. 

Break Apple’s Encryption For All Its Users

The British government has served Apple with a Technical Capability Notice under the Investigatory Powers Act of 2016, also known as the Snoopers’ Charter—a fitting name, considering its intent. This law gives law enforcement the power to demand access to encrypted communications, overriding any security measures tech companies put in place.

But here’s the kicker: Apple wouldn’t even be allowed to warn its users that this is happening. We only know about this development because of leaks being reported by tech journalists at the Washington Post. This isn’t about targeting specific criminals with a warrant. The UK wants Apple to create a master key, a built-in vulnerability that would let the government unlock any iPhone’s cloud-stored content at will. And if Apple complies? The floodgates open.

Mike Salem of the Consumer Choice Center’s UK team put it well by saying,

“This is far beyond proportional as a response to national security threats, and sets an extremely dangerous precedent. Notices such as these will be served to other companies and other countries will want access to the same data the UK is trying to access. Crucially, it leaves all iCloud users in a vulnerable position, with information such as their personal details and photos exposed and un-encrypted, allowing criminals and foreign adversaries full access.”

Why Encryption Matters

Encryption is the bedrock of digital security.

At its most basic, it’s no different than when you’re in school and passing a note in class but every word is coded to mean something else so that the contents are a secret. See You After Class For Football Practice could be coded 10 thousand different ways and actually mean This Teacher Is Super Weird OMG Cringe. Like with ciphers or coded messages, letters are scrambled, but with digital encryption, the code – or key –for the note passed in class, changes after every single use. In the real world, that is the foundation of encrypted chat like WhatsApp, Signal, or iMessage on an Apple device or even HTTPS on your browser. 

Governments have long been frustrated by this. Former FBI Director Christopher Wray once argued before Congress that they should legislate a ban on commercial and personal encryption to help law enforcement catch criminals. He later reversed his position to encryption being the best consumer bulwark against Chinese hacks. The argument is always the same: they need access to encrypted devices to investigate crimes.

What the UK Is Demanding

Here’s the problem—weakening encryption for one case weakens it for everyone. If Apple builds a backdoor for the UK government, it’s only a matter of time before other governments demand the same access. And once an encryption backdoor exists, it’s a security risk that bad actors could exploit.

Rather than requesting access to specific user data through proper legal channels, the UK government is demanding a built-in backdoor that would allow authorities to unlock and access any Apple user’s stored data at will.

Apple has long resisted such demands, particularly when it comes to iPhone security. The company introduced Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in 2022, allowing users to fully encrypt their iCloud backups—meaning not even Apple could access them. It was a long-awaited move, especially after the FBI pressured Apple to delay rolling it out years earlier during Trump’s presidency.

Most iPhone and Mac users don’t enable ADP, but those who do gain significantly stronger protections against hacking, unauthorized surveillance, and data breaches. If Apple complies with the UK’s order, this level of security could be erased overnight.

What Happens Next?

Right now, Apple is legally forbidden from confirming whether it received the UK’s demand. However, leaks suggest Apple’s likely response will be to end encrypted storage in the UK entirely rather than compromise its security model. That decision would impact millions of UK users, but it’s entirely in the hands of secretive review boards that Apple will be appealing to behind closed doors.

The Bigger Picture

This fight is part of a larger trend—governments worldwide are pushing for more control over encrypted services, whether it’s cloud storage, messaging apps, or even VPNs that let users bypass restrictive online regulations.

But here’s the reality: Apple knows that consumers expect privacy, and it has shown a willingness to fight for encryption when it matters. That’s why it’s crucial to speak up, vote with your wallet, and protect your data.

✔ Enable Advanced Data Protection
✔ Update your passwords regularly
✔ Stay informed on digital privacy laws

Because once encryption is gone, it’s gone for good.

en_USEN

Follow us

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

OTTAWA

718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5

© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER

Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org