7OH: Regulation, not prohibition

The FDA wants the DEA to treat 7-OH like heroin. We’re making the case for a smarter path: evidence-based regulation that protects consumers without ignoring adult choice.

When Washington meets a new market, the first instinct is too often to ban it.

7-OH has become the latest test of whether policymakers will follow evidence or headlines. The answer to a poorly understood market is not to push consumers into the shadows, but to set clear rules that make products safer, labels honest, and bad actors easier to police.

Prohibition path

Ban first. Understand later.

Scheduling 7-OH like heroin would not make consumers safer. It would remove legal safeguards, erase accountability, and push adults toward products that are harder to test, label, or regulate.

The Smarter path

Regulate clearly.

A smarter framework can protect consumers while preserving adult choice: age verification, honest labeling, third-party testing, product standards, and enforcement against unsafe or deceptive products.

Policy Paper

Regulation over Prohibition

This paper argues against scheduling 7-OH as a Schedule I substance and explains why prohibition would do more harm than good.

Prohibition drives consumers to unregulated markets, undermines safety, and denies adults access to lawful choices.

Instead, we propose a smarter regulatory framework that protects consumers, enables innovation, and preserves adult access.

RESOURCE LIBRARY

CCC’s 7-OH work in one place

Browse CCC’s 7-OH advocacy work, including press releases, media hits, open letters, and opinion pieces.

VIDEO LIBRARY

7-OH in Focus

Watch CCC’s latest videos on 7-OH, consumer choice, and the case for regulation over prohibition.

FEATURED VIDEO

A ban on 7-OH will only lead to more harm

The FDA is moving to schedule 7-hydroxymitragynine as a controlled substance. If it goes through, millions of Americans lose access overnight — including people managing chronic pain, veterans with PTSD, and individuals using it to get off opioids.