India’s FASTag system was designed to make our highways faster, not harder. Introduced as a seamless solution for digital tolling, FASTags promised shorter queues, smoother rides, and less fuel wasted in traffic. But as enforcement gets stricter and glitches remain unresolved, consumers are starting to pay the price, not just in tolls, but in frustration. From Delhi to Pune, drivers are being penalized for so-called “improper” FASTag usage. That includes loosely affixed stickers, low readability, or slight placement errors, issues often caused by heat, wear and tear, or curved windshields, not by any ill intent. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has warned that such vehicles could be banned from using FASTag lanes altogether.
This raises an important question: Should commuters be punished for technical flaws in a system they were encouraged an then forced, to adopt? The transition to digital tolling was never optional for consumers. After initial cashback incentives, the government mandated FASTags for all private vehicles and even introduced double toll charges for cash users. Most users complied in good faith. But now, with blacklisting, failed scans, and enforcement crackdowns, many feel they are being penalized for things beyond their control. For instance, users have reported perfectly working tags being marked “blacklisted” without warning due to minor delays in recharge, or incorrect tagging by banks.
In several cases, consumers have had to pay double tolls or were redirected to cash lanes because the system failed to recognize their tag. That defeats the very promise of ease, speed, and efficiency. Rather than fixing backend issues, the burden is being shifted on to consumers. A sticker not sticking properly becomes a punishable offense. A delayed recharge leads to blacklisting. These aren’t just inconveniences, they’re policy failures wrapped in red tape. Globally, more innovative approaches are gaining ground. Singapore, for example, has piloted a satellite-based ERP 2.0 system that eliminates the need for physical tags. In the UK, most toll roads rely on automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) rather than RFID tags, reducing friction and failure points.
India’s digital infrastructure should evolve around consumers with error tolerance, ease of use, and precision. The FASTag framework should be designed to accommodate occasional lapses, not treat every deviation as defiance. Enforcement should be proportionate, not punitive. Warnings or onthe-spot corrections would go much further than threats of blacklisting or roadblocks. There should also be a robust grievance redressal mechanism with clear accountability from issuing banks and NHAI, not just auto-generated helpline responses that leave users stranded.
What India needs is a consumerfirst approach to digital policy. Whether it is tolls, payments, or mobility, the test of any digital service is how well it handles real-world imperfections. And right now, FASTag is failing that test. Consumers signed up for FASTags believing it would save time and reduce stress, not add new ones. They deserve a system that works with them, not against them. If the goal is progress, consumers must feel like partners, not suspects.
Read the full text here