fbpx

CFPB’s fraud lawsuit against peer-to-peer payment apps reeks of regulation by enforcement that will harm consumers

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Arizona against the owners of the payment platform Zelle, alleging that app has not done enough to combat payment frauds committed by scammers.

Zelle, jointly owned by seven of the nation’s largest banks, is a popular FinTech peer-to-peer payment platform used by consumers to easy send and receive money without additional fees.

Yaël Ossowski, deputy director of the consumer advocacy group Consumer Choice Center, responds to the suit:

“In the waning days of the Biden Administration, the CFPB is overstepping its authority in suing a peer-to-peer payment app used by millions of consumers to send and receive payments and ignoring the thousands of scammers they could easily reach,” said Ossowski.

“In targeting the platform rather than punishing those who perpetuate fraud, the agency is regulating by enforcement, hoping to introduce backdoor liability for FinTech firms and payment services that hasn’t been endorsed or approved by Congress. This could make debanking and offloading of customers even worse.

Payment services already employ strict anti-fraud and scam measures that allow consumers to get their money back. Using lawfare to enact new policies will result in costly and intrusive rules that will degrade the consumer experience, make it more difficult for consumers to use or even qualify for these apps, and likely create more amenable conditions for bad actors to steal,concluded Ossowski.

Earlier this month, the Consumer Choice Center launched a policy primer to evaluate legislative solutions for combatting and alleviating the harm caused by payment scams and frauds.

This primer analyzes the Protecting Consumers From Payment Scams Act, and whether the liability remedies proposed would help combat consumer fraud and scams or would ultimately create unintended consequences for consumers that do not punish wrongdoers.

The primer includes key policy suggestions for legislators to help consumers avoid frauds and scams while demonstrating the errors that would come with expanded institutional liability:

  • Shifting liability to financial institutions and payment apps will ultimately backfire on consumers, leading to more expansive financial surveillance, higher costs due to more compliance and reimbursements, and a generally degraded consumer experience that eradicates the advantage of popular financial tech and banks.
  • Consumer financial education is the most effective way to prevent scams.
  • A national privacy law fostering innovation while protecting consumers
  • Stiffer penalties for individuals committing frauds and scams

READ THE PRIMER HERE


The CCC represents consumers in over 100 countries across the globe. We closely monitor regulatory trends in Ottawa, Washington, Brussels, Geneva, Lima, Brasilia, and other hotspots of regulation and inform and activate consumers to fight for #ConsumerChoice. Learn more at consumerchoicecenter.org.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
en_USEN

Follow us

Contact Info

WASHINGTON

712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002

BRUSSELS

Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium

LONDON

Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK

KUALA LUMPUR

Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia

© COPYRIGHT 2024, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER