HEARTLAND: Jeff Stier, a senior fellow at the Consumer Choice Center and a policy advisor for The Heartland Institute, which publishes Health Care News, says the Starbucks decision is an unnecessary government interference.
“There is zero evidence that Proposition 65 is promoting public health,” Stier said. “Certainly people can make their own decisions about whether to drink coffee, but the suggestion that any consumption of acrylamide by drinking coffee could lead to cancer is ridiculous.”
712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002
Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium
Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK
Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia
© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER
712 H St NE PMB 94982
Washington, DC 20002
Rond Point Schuman 6, Box 5 Brussels, 1040, Belgium
Golden Cross House, 8 Duncannon Street
London, WC2N 4JF, UK
Block D, Platinum Sentral, Jalan Stesen Sentral 2, Level 3 - 5 Kuala Lumpur, 50470, Malaysia
718-170 Laurier Ave W Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5
© COPYRIGHT 2025, CONSUMER CHOICE CENTER
Also from the Consumer Choice Center: ConsumerChamps.EU | FreeTrade4us.org
