Defund the World Health Organization

This page provides you with resources on the Consumer Choice Center’s campaign on defunding the World Health Organization. Further media hits, graphics, and podcasts will be added here on an ongoing base.

The WHO needs to focus on its core priority, responding to international health crises. Western democracies are the main funder of the WHO. Taxpayers in countries like the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom should demand more transparency and accountability within the WHO. If pariahs like Robert Mugabe and the Iranian government keep dominating this vital tool for global health it might be time to defund the WHO, transfer some of its vital functions to a more effective organization such as the World Bank or start a new organization focusing on health crisis response. Global health is too important to leave it in the hands of the current WHO.

Fred Roeder, Health Economist and Managing Director of the Consumer Choice Center

Five reasons to #defundWHO:

1)    The WHO focuses more on fighting non communicable diseases than on identifying and containing threats to global public health such as Ebola.

2)    The WHO preaches openness but most decisions are taken behind closed doors and journalists are regularly being removed from Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Conferences of the Parties.

3)    The WHO actively schmoozes with dictators like Robert Mugabe and colludes with regimes such as Vladimir Putin’s Russia to keep internal power structures afloat. Western taxpayers shoulder the bill of all this.

4)    The WHO has sky-high travel costs: The WHO spends $28,500 per staffer or the per capita GDP of developed countries like Spain or Italy on travel per year!

5)     The WHO loves to go on luxury trips in the name of public health: One example is a trip to the Seychelles for a workshop at the stunning Coral Strand Hotel. They hosted a regional African meeting on an island far away from nearly all African countries because of the Seychelles “comprehensive tobacco control laws.”


Media hits:

CapX: Fight or business class flight? The WHO needs to get its priorities straight

Spiked: WHO’s afraid of vaping

Estotambiensucede: La OMS y sus lazos con Robert Mugabe: ¿qué tan comprometidos están con la salud y los derechos humanos?

Liberal HR: Svjetska zdravstvena organizacija: politika u prvom, zdravlje u drugom planu

Direktno: UHLJEBIZAM Kolumnist Bertović objasnio nam je kako to rade ‘stručnjaci’ u Svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji

Atlantico: OMS: buone intenzioni, cattive esecuzioni

Gli Stati Generali: Se ci interessa la salute dei fumatori smettiamola di osteggiare il fumo 2.0

Washington Examiner: WHO wants to ban trans fats – that’s just one reason they should be defunded

Newsmax: WHO’s Outrageous Expenses Grounds for Funding Disqualification

FOX News: This flawed UN health agency threatens America’s food supply. It’s time for badly needed reform

Statement: World No Tobacco Day Embraces the Wrong Approach

Washington Examiner: Congressional oversight weeds out corrupt international junk science

American Spectator: The World Health Organization Is A Mess: Will Trump Fix It?

Die Welt: Brauchen wir die WHO noch?

HuffingtonPost Deutschland: Fünf Gründe warum es an der Zeit ist die WHO zu schließen

FEE Online: Who needs the WHO? Not the world’s poor

Tabula: What is behind the tobacco control law? (in Georgian)

Caucasus Business Week: It is time to defund the WHO


La Chronique Agora: Il est temps d’abolir l’OMS

CommentCentral: The case for defunding the WHO

1828UK: Five reasons to rethink Britain’s global public health spending